[sparkscoffee] Re: Emailing: Scan0158 - Captalism Stinks On Ice

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:57:28 -0400

DR
My understanding is that stock holders are not on salary they simply get  
dividens and the really big ones can get enough cash to buy  mega-yachts, 
mansions and politicians? Don't believe the country agrees  with you on allow 
moving headquaters to another country to dodge taxes  and sticking the rest 
of us to pay for all our expenses? 
 
Stan
 
 
In a message dated 9/23/2014 4:44:17 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:

Stanley,  



The yacht owners are also paid salaries.


I know, you don't let little things like correct understanding get in the  
way of socialist / communist talking points.


Eliminate the Corporate Income Tax.  We are much higher than Canada  and 
Europe.


If I owned a Corporation or were CEO, I'd move the Corporation to  Canada.  
I'd continue to pay USA wages and taxes on USA earnings, but not  have the 
total International earnings taxed by USA tax rates.


My employees would of course, pay USA income taxes as would I.


More money would be in the Corporation's pot to invest.


More investment is good.


If I made the Corporation $20 million dollars for doing this, I would  
expect a bonus equal to the cost of a yacht.


Wouldn't you?


73
DR


On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Redacted sender _Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  for DMARC <_dmarc-noreply@freelists.org_ 
(mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) > wrote:


DR
Where does the USA get the money to run the country and bomb ISIS and  who 
owns mega-yachts and mega-mansions, little ole stock holders? Again, we  
agree to disagree, sorry friend.
 
Stanley
 
 



 
In a message dated 9/23/2014 3:32:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_n1ea@arrl.net_ (mailto:n1ea@xxxxxxxx)  writes:

No, Comrade.  


In your retirement you should take a  course in economics and  corporations.


Bigger profits do NOT mean bigger mega yachts, bigger mega mansions.  


Bigger profits mean bigger dividends for the stockholders - who are  they? 
Union pension plans, and other pension plans, and people - like you  and me.


Bigger profits also means more money to invest in capital  investments, 
like new USA ships - maybe with ARA on them.  It means a  new factory maybe 
near you where you can consult and earn money - where's  the money going to 
come from?  Those bigger profits.


Stan, you just don't understand.


Taxing corporations hurts everyone.


If Communists and Socialists didn't misinform the uninformed  especially 
the innocent youth, things would be better, but it also might  lead themselves 
to have to face the facts that their thinking was  defective because the 
"facts" on which their evaluation of capitalism was  just plain WRONG.


Capitalists and Socialists are only interested in power and  control.  Some 
lower members are the innocent, ignorant of the  truth.  The really violent 
Communists when they get in power execute  those innocent when they finally 
grab power away from the people.


73


73
David


On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Redacted sender _Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  for DMARC <_dmarc-noreply@freelists.org_ 
(mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) > wrote:


DR
Think, think,think. No taxes means BIGGER PROFITS to buy  bigger mega 
Yachts, bigger mega Mansions etc.. Killing unions, lower  wages, longer working 
hours, fewer holidays, shorter vacations, less  safety rules etc, which is 
the same as less taxes to maintain  or increase profits which we must not 
hurt, will also bring jobs  and the factories back. Slave labor is the best. 
Think, think, think,  

Comrade B, the mensh
 
 

 
In a message dated 9/21/2014 9:43:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_n1ea@arrl.net_ (mailto:n1ea@xxxxxxxx)  writes:

Corporations pass taxation costs to consumers.  Eliminate  corporation 
income taxes, you will increase gross national product  because goods will 
cost. 
Only a socialist would be stupid enough to tax corporations. 
73 
DR
On Sep 19, 2014 4:43 PM, "Redacted sender _Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  for DMARC" <_dmarc-noreply@freelists.org_ 
(mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) > wrote:


Everyone
Ask what you can do for your country, not what your country can  do for 
you. Patriotism Before Profitism,
Not Profitism Before Patriotism.
 
Reducing Corporate Taxes to keep Businesses here is a form of  bribary and 
shifts the burden of necessary
taxes on the rest of us no matter how you slice it.
 
Stanley
 
 
Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or  link 
attachments:
 
Scan0158
 

Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs  may prevent 
sending or receiving certain types of file  attachments.  Check your e-mail 
security settings to determine  how attachments are  handled.






















Other related posts: