Everyone Instead of selling U.S. bonds we are selling U.S. Companies to China and looks like there is no end. Those Capitalists sure are clever with deep pockets. Saw it on TV and the talk was that they paid 30% over Smithfields value and their State owned bank loaned the money. Ain't Captilism wonderful? Didn't see it in the newspaper, only on PBS TV. Stanley * * * (http://grist.org/food/pork-it-over-u-s-okays-chinese-purchase-of-its-largest-pig-company/#) (http://facebook.com/grist.org/) (https://twitter.com/grist) Pork it over: U.S. OKs Chinese purchase of its largest pig company By _Nathanael Johnson_ (http://grist.org/author/nathanael-johnson/) 10 Sep 2013 11:32 AM _comments_ (http://grist.org/food/pork-it-over-u-s-okays-chinese-purchase-of-its-largest-pig-company/#disqus_thread) Share Share Pork it over: U.S. OKs Chinese purchase of its largest pig company (http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/facebook/offer?url=http://grist.org/food/pork-it-over-u-s-okays-chinese-purchase-of-its-largest-pig-compa ny/&title=Pork+it+over:+U.S.+OKs+Chinese+purchase+of+its+largest+pig+company &description=The+feds+allow+the+sale+of+Smithfield+to+a+Chinese+swine+conglo merate,+after+determining+bacon+supplies+are+not+critical+to+U.S.+security.+ &pubid=ra-4dc04d5824409f84) (http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/twitter/offer?url=http://grist.org/food/pork-it-over-u-s-okays-chinese-purcha se-of-its-largest-pig-company/&title=Pork+it+over:+U.S.+OKs+Chinese+purchase +of+its+largest+pig+company&description=The+feds+allow+the+sale+o f+Smithfield+to+a+Chinese+swine+conglomerate,+after+determining+bacon+supplies+are+not+ critical+to+U.S.+security.+&pubid=ra-4dc04d5824409f84&text=Pork+it+over:+U.S .+OKs+Chinese+purchase+of+its+largest+pig+company&via=grist) (mailto:?subject=Pork it over: U.S. OKs Chinese purchase of its largest pig company&body=http://grist.org/food/pork-it-over-u-s-okays-chinese-purchase-of-its-largest-pig-company/) (http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/offer?url=http://grist.org/food/pork-it-over-u-s-okays-chinese-purchase-of-its-large st-pig-company/&title=Pork+it+over:+U.S.+OKs+Chinese+purchase+of+its+largest +pig+company&description=The+feds+allow+the+sale+of+Smithfield+to+a+Chinese+ swine+conglomerate,+after+determining+bacon+supplies+are+not+critical+to+U.S .+security.+&pubid=ra-4dc04d5824409f84) × _Just Chaos_ (http://www.flickr.com/people/7326810@N08/) Well they’ve done it. The U.S. government has signed off on a deal to sell the biggest player in the domestic pork industry to a Chinese firm, merging the two biggest pig producers in the world. The feds had held up the merger _since May_ (http://grist.org/news/smithfield-worlds-largest-pork-producer-could-be-sold-to-a-chinese-company/) to determine if it might be a threat to national security. And now they’ve decided that no, foreign control of the bacon supply will not imperil our country’s integrity. You may feel differently. And actually there are people who have real concerns. Here’s Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), for example, writing at _Politico_ (http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/united-states-food-innovation-96238.html) : Smithfield may only be the beginning. Experts testified at a recent Senate Agriculture Committee hearing that China is watching this deal and waiting in the wings to purchase more U.S. food companies… To be sure, the purchase of one American food company does not jeopardize America’s food independence. But Smithfield is our largest pork producer — will China or other countries seek to purchase our largest poultry, or dairy, or corn producers next? Is it in America’s security interests if in a decade or two our food supply is 30, or 60, or 90 percent foreign owned? Stabenow’s _whole op-ed_ (http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/united-states-food-innovation-96238.html) is a good primer for this issue, and worth a read. Essentially, China has a lot to gain when its companies buy American businesses, but China is more restrictive when it comes to American companies buying its businesses. I’ve spent a lot of time _reporting on swine farming_ (http://harpers.org/archive/2006/05/swine-of-the-times/) , and Smithfield grows hogs in a way that I find repellent: It’s a form of agriculture that squeezes farmers, hurts pigs, and smells like hair burning in a pit toilet. But it’s also amazingly efficient in converting feed to perfectly identical cuts of meat. Shuanghui, the Chinese company buying Smithfield, wants access to that expertise. Say what you like about Smithfield — it’s not _throwing dead pigs into rivers these days_ (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/29/dead-pigs-china-water-supply) . Brutally efficient is better than just plain brutal. Still, I eagerly await the day when the much more humane _Niman Ranch_ (http://www.nimanranch.com/Index.aspx) announces that it’s buying Shuanghui. Investors still could reject the Smithfield-Shanghui deal, but most observers are predicting that they are unlikely to do so.