[SI-LIST] small device de-embedding & modeling

  • From: Brecht Machiels <brecht.machiels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:50:58 +0200

Hi,

I would like to obtain measurements of MOSFETs that are valid up to high 
frequencies (110GHz). Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with de-embedding. 
I'm currently investigating a number of de-embedding techniques:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/srchabstract.jsp?tp=&arnumber=830987&queryText%3D.QT.A+four-step+method+for+de-embedding+gigahertz.QT.%26openedRefinements%3D*%26searchField%3DSearch+All
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/srchabstract.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4141067&queryText%3D.QT.Efficient+De-Embedding+Technique+for+110-GHz+Deep-Channel-MOSFET+.QT.%26openedRefinements%3D*%26searchField%3DSearch+All

I've given the first of these a quick try by emulating a measurement 
using a test fixture (unlikely to be optimal) and dummy structures 
simulated in ADS momentum. Afterwards, I insert a MOSFET model into the 
test fixture using HSPICE. From the obtained S-parameters I can perform 
de-embedding.

For large MOSFETs (W > 32 um), the de-embedded S21 and S12 are indeed 
very close to the model's S21 and S12. S11 and S22 are less closely 
matched to the model's, but still close. At higher frequencies (> 80 
GHz), the error becomes larger.

For small MOSFETs, the de-embedded measurements only fit the model at 
lower frequencies. I assume this is to be expected as the DUT's 
properties become smaller compared to the test fixtures.

Also, the articles on de-embedding I have read/scrolled through always 
use large MOSFETs for the DUT (W > 64 um) when verifying the presented 
de-embedding technique.

This makes me wonder how typical transistor models are developed. I 
assume a number of large transistors are measured to which a model is 
fitted (BSIM, for example). Smaller transistors are modeled by means of 
an implicit extrapolation. Could that be anywhere near how it's done?

Unfortunately, I need to use small transistors (W as small as 2 um) in 
my design, so I'm not sure how to continue from here. Any suggestions?

Kind regards,
Brecht

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: