Hi Mallikarjun, Steve Weir pointed out to me off list that I might have misunderstood your question "What drives these characteristic impedance values? " At first blush I thought you meant "What physical quantities drive characteristic impedance values?" but on mature reflection you may have meant "What design goals drive us to seek a particular impedance target?" It turns out that there's a lot of fuzzy urban myth about how the 50 ohms (or 75 ohms or 300 ohms) standards came about. There's a good essay with some plausible arguments here: http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/458-why-fifty-ohms According to the essay, the historical design goals that led to the 50/75/300 ohm standards aren't relevant to SI because (for example) we don't use co-ax t-lines much (especially air-spaced co-ax t-lines) and maximal power handling isn't generally a goal in SI. However 50 ohms lives on through "installed base" inertia. Let's say connector manufacturers have historically made 50 ohm connectors. Then, all else equal, you might design everything else to match that just to leverage the high volume/low cost connector. Best regards, -- Colin ____________________ Colin Warwick Product Manager for Signal Integrity, Power Integrity, and EMI/EMC tools for High-Speed Digital Design Keysight EEsof EDA Phone +1 978 681 2406 colin_warwick@xxxxxxxxxxxx Blog updates: http://signal-integrity.blogs.keysight.com/newsletter/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu