[SI-LIST] Re: "dominant" losses
- From: Dimiter Popoff <dimiter.popoff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:07:30 +0200
Jeff Loyer,
> My question is, am I the only one who construes the term "dominates" to
> imply that the other term is insignificant?
I take advantage of my English being non-native (so my Oxford dictionary
is usually within reach :-).
dominant - dominating, ruling, prevailing.
dominate - have commanding influence over; overlook, occupy commanding position.
So your interpretation "non-dominant values are negligible" seems wrong.
I had also given this a thought but, like probably any engineering person,
thought that since the dominating positions change there should be also
an equilibrium etc., as you explained in your posting.
Dimiter
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff
Transgalactic Instruments, Gourko Str. 25 b, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
http://transgalactic.freeyellow.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
