[SI-LIST] Re: delay tuning method of differential pair

  • From: Robert Haller <rhaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: shlepnev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcbtime@xxxxxxxx, si-list <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:19:40 -0500

Yuriy,
        Nice paper. I have never liked serpentine, and prefer to correct
skew at ends, with appropriate corroborating 3D simulations.
The challenge I see is simulating thousands of links (in a timely manner)
and getting all of them right.
Regards
Bob Haller
Architect
Extreme Networks

-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Yuriy Shlepnev
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:04 PM
To: pcbtime@xxxxxxxx; 'si-list'
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: delay tuning method of differential pair

When estimating different skew compensation structures, in addition to
comparison of SDD11 and SDD21, you have to compare the mode transformation
parameters SDC11, SDC22 (near-end mode transformation) and SDC12, SDC21
(far-end mode transformation). In general, skew compensation for coupled
differential pairs must be formulated not in terms of the length matching,
but rather as minimization of the differential reflection and near and far
end mode transformation parameters. See example at this presentation
www.simberian.com/AppNotes/Shlepnev_DesignInsights_FRSI_Oct3_2013.pdf
(starting from slide 29). As you can see, addition of serpentines for some
structures may not improve the "skew" and make things worse. Do
comprehensive analysis with the tools that capture the relevant effects.

Best regards,
Yuriy

Yuriy Shlepnev, Ph.D.
President, Simberian Inc.
3030 S Torrey Pines Dr. Las Vegas, NV 89146, USA Office +1-702-876-2882;
Fax +1-702-482-7903 Cell +1-206-409-2368; Virtual +1-408-627-7706
Skype: shlepnev

www.simberian.com
Simbeor - Accurate, Fast, Easy and Affordable Electromagnetic Signal
Integrity Software
2010 and 2011 DesignVision Award Winner


-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of pcbtime
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:33 AM
To: si-list
Subject: [SI-LIST] delay tuning method of differential pair

Hi Expert
I was confuse about the delay tuning  method. We have two choice: Single
loop or small serpentines Single loop can match the length quickly then
small serpentines. That's mean:
Single loop has big different when tuning but short time.
small serpentines has small different when tuning but takes long time.

We try to simulation the result is below 12.5GHZ. We can't find any
different in SDD21 and SDD11 That's mean Single loop and small serpentines
is almost same when signal is below 8GBps Why most the design guide force
to
use small serpentines

And I am so sorry for send two mail with unreadable code

Best Regards
pcbtime------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: