Han, I think your life will be easiest if you look at a plane as a good=20 reflector. Mapping the RLCG into the "other conductor" is a convenience that works=20 reasonably well to reduce computations in things like 2D planar=20 models. Sometimes it is fine, other times it leads to serious errors, as=20 can occur in connector models. If you are talking about the effect the presence of a plane has on multiple= =20 signal lines, then "minimal" is perhaps inappropriate. A semi-rigid coax=20 fits that description a lot better than a plane. For a plane, we are=20 concerned with how far away each signal is from each other, and each from=20 the plane. We can readily build constructions where the signal to plane=20 coupling is weak, and the signal to signal coupling is anything but=20 "minimal". Fortunately, such constructions are contrived and not very=20 economical. Doug Smith has examples on his web site, such as parallel=20 signals crossing a split. Steve. At 11:19 PM 9/23/2005 -0700, Bi Han wrote: >In papers, I often read "solid ground plane" concept. Some papers will=20 >treat it as reference node. > >As I know, ground plane could not be treated as "ideal ground" no matter=20 >how good/wide/thick it is. The assumption behind it could be different as= =20 >I will present my understanding below. > > From the view of EM modeling, this solid ground plane make "ground=20 > reduction method" effictive and accurate. "ground reduction" means fold=20 > ground plane RLCG into signal trace, thus ground plane could be treated=20 > as ideal ground. > > From design view, the benefit I could see for now, is that solid ground=20 > plane make each loop's mutual inductance minimal, thus minimize cross= talk. > >Any different ideas? > >thanks, >Han > >--------------------------------- > =D1=C5=BB=A2=C3=E2=B7=D1G=D3=CA=CF=E4=A3=AD=D6=D0=B9=FA=B5=DA=D2=BB=BE=F8= =CE=DE=C0=AC=BB=F8=D3=CA=BC=FE=C9=A7=C8=C5=B3=AC=B4=F3=D3=CA=CF=E4 > =D1=C5=BB=A2=D6=FA=CA=D6=A3=AD=CB=D1=CB=F7=A1=A2=C9=B1=B6=BE=A1=A2=B7=C0= =C9=A7=C8=C5 > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe from si-list: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >For help: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > >List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > >List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu