[SI-LIST] Re: TFT display modules with _min_ dot clock frequency spec
- From: olaney@xxxxxxxx
- To: dp@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 18:57:31 -0700
This might be obvious, but it's worth a mention anyway. Absent a PLL,
the LCDs I've worked with generally have static clocking down to DC. It
is conceivable that the design might use dynamic logic speed up on-panel
circuits built with amorphous silicon, but it is hard to believe that the
resulting minimum clock would be so high. So, take a close look at the
spec sheet and check if the 25 MHz number is actually a minimum for the
maximum clock rate, i.e. the thing will crap out at some faster rate, but
never at a slower one.
Regards,
Orin
On Wed, 2 May 2007 4:21:53 +0300 Dimiter Popoff <dp@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Posted this to two newsgroups, then I thought actually I might have
> better chances to find someone in the TFT module industry via the
> Si-list, so here it goes.
>
> I have been looking around for a TFT module for a design (5" to 8"
> sized, 800x480 min.,thin) and found some really good looking.
> The problem I have is that some of them specify a minimum dot
> clock
> frequency, typically well above 25 MHz.
> Now apart from a PLL they may have inside the module I can think
> of little reasons why they need that; and I have not heard of such
> a
> thing, but I am far from the insides of these (hence my posting
> :-).
> I could pretty well live at a 30 Hz or even 20 Hz frame rate,
> which would mean 16 MHz clock or below, thus lower power,
> less memory bandwidth etc.
> TFTs don't flicker, I have played with the first one I had 5-6
> years
> back and there was absolutely no visible benefit of increased clock
> frequency.
>
> Anyone know why this minimum clock spec? Any knowledge on that?
> Some of the best fits I find do specify it and it is in conflict
> with
> a really major simplification I can make to the design....
> So my hope is that this spec is put in order to keep some high
> enough
> frame rate to satisfy some common controller thing, not really a
> must.
> I'll try to ask the manufacturers directly, but perhaps I have a
> better chance to find out something via usenet.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dimiter
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Dimiter Popoff Transgalactic Instruments
>
> http://www.tgi-sci.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
> field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> @freelists.org with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
