Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dan Both instruments perform very well and are accurate However, I prefer the Tektronix because: * Aside from the specifications, the TDR pulses are typically much better than specified. They were" specified around 30 ps at one time but typically measured around 14ps... This is nearly as good as the 10 ps advertised by Pulse. * The heads are much smaller and lighter so, when the umbilical cable connects the head to the instrument the head can be more easily to difficult to access points. Be sure to make up adapters from the test head to the point of contact to about 3 inches maximum length, and for differential signals make the lengths of the two sides identical. Use semirigid .141 OD or .093" premade coaxes and cut them in half for the two sides of the differential line. Pasternack Enterprises is a good cheap source. The closer the head is to the DUT the greater the accuracy. Short the two sides together to get an accurate calibration of the adapter interface to your dut. Agilent ADS is the best simulator because it takes full advantage of all the frequency dependent parameters, and the built-in models can be adjusted to mimic the measured data. Software designed to convert the TDR data into S-Parameters is not necessary in ADS because the models are adjusted to match the time domain response even though the simulation takes place in the frequency domain and is converted back. Good Hunting. Ron On 11/2/2010 3:15 PM, Dan wrote: > Hi all, > I am planning to buy TDR equipments. I have shortlisted two equipments, one > from Agilent and anther Tektronix, along with the mainframe. Can anybody let > me know your comments or reviews about these equipment and your advice or > idea to buy this? > > I am also planning to do s-parameter extraction from the TDR measurement. So > i need to TDT also. So i am adding a samping module. > > Agilent: > mainframe: 86100C (option202 for extarcting s-parameter touchstone) > TDR: 54754A (can anyone tell me the achievable rise time or frequency in > this module) > Sampling module: 86112A > > Tektronix: > mainframe: DSA8200 (80SSPAR Iconnect for s-parameter extraction) > TDR: 80E04 (can anyone tell me the achievable rise time or frequency in this > module) > Sampling module for TDT: 80E03 > > Is TEK better than Agilent. Is TEK's Iconnect outperforms Agilent's option > 202 in the mainframe to extract s-parameter touchstone? > > Thank You for your time. > > DAN > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > -- Ronald B. Miller, Microwave/SI Engineer RAIL = NOISE + REFLECTIONS Gigahertz Data Div of MI Corp. \\ // \\ // 7721 Sunset Avenue \\// \\// Newark, CA 94560 ->JITTER<- EYE ->JITTER<- tel 510-793-4744, //\\ //\\ fax 510-742-6686 // \\ // \\ www.ghzdata.com RAIL = NOISE + REFLECTIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu