Hello All- Thanks for your feedback. The resin content is the most likely contributor to the difference in results. I will look into it with our manufacturing team. I'd prefer not to disclose which board materials, but in order to get an idea of the results, here are the values that I've measured/calculated with the material names removed: Board #1 4mil (er=3.43; vp=156.8 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.80; vp= 165.1 ps/in) Board #2 4mil (er=3.71; vp=163.1 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.86; vp= 166.3 ps/in) Board #3 4mil (er=3.61; vp=160.9 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.87; vp= 166.5 ps/in) Board #4 4mil (er=3.63; vp=161.4 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.81; vp= 165.2 ps/in) Board #5 4mil (er=3.27; vp=153.1 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.44; vp= 157.1 ps/in) Board #6 4mil (er=4.08; vp=171.1 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.96; vp= 168.6 ps/in). In summary, there is a change of speed of between -3ps/in and +8ps/in, and a change in dielectric of between -0.12 and +0.37. Regards, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ryan Satrom | Signal Integrity Engineer Phone: 651-407-7711 | Fax: 651-407-7290 r.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | Skype: satromium Multitest Contactor Division 4444 Centerville Road, Suite 105 Saint Paul, MN, USA, 55127 http://www.multitest.com From: Kirby Goulet <kgoulet@xxxxxxxx> To: "ryan.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ryan.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 08/16/2012 10:49 AM Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Stripline Propagation Velocity Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi Ryan Here is a report from a impedance calculator. One case with 4mil cores, and two cases with 8mil cores (with two trace widths). All cases the cores are Er 4.2 and the resin at 3.6. This includes a trapezoidal cross-section. The propagation velocities changed. Not sure if in the amount you expected. ------------------------------- 2D Impedance Calculator Program Version 0.2.1.88 Time: Thu Aug 16 11:36:28 2012 GPL Version 2.0 ------------------------------- Simulation pix map 140 pixels high by 700 pixels wide. 295024 bytes allocated for bmp. Simulation pix map 120 pixels high by 700 pixels wide. 253024 bytes allocated for bmp. INPUT PARAMETERS: Layer Thick Specifications Copper Plane Top 1.30 Opening w=0.0 offset=0.0 Laminate Layer 1 4.00 Resin Content 64.3% 3.2-6.0 Signal Layer 1 1.35 Width=4.0 Etchback=0.50 Laminate Layer 2 4.00 Resin Content 64.3% 3.2-6.0 Copper Plane Bottom 1.30 Opening w=0.0 offset=0.0 Layer Thick Er Loss Tangent Copper Plane Top 1.30 3.20 Laminate Layer 1 4.00 4.20 0.00120 Signal Layer 1 1.35 3.60 0.00120 Laminate Layer 2 4.00 4.20 0.00120 Copper Plane Bottom 1.30 3.20 Rdc_trace_1= 143.64 milliohms/in 20C DC resistance by pixel count: Rdc_trace_1= 139.650 milliohm/in. C = 3.930 pF/in L = 7.500 nH/in. Er = 4.106 Loss_tan = 0.00120 Zo = 43.685 Ohms Delay = 171.675 ps/in. Simulation pix map 200 pixels high by 700 pixels wide. 421024 bytes allocated for bmp. INPUT PARAMETERS: Layer Thick Specifications Copper Plane Top 1.30 Opening w=0.0 offset=0.0 Laminate Layer 1 8.00 Resin Content 64.3% 3.2-6.0 Signal Layer 1 1.35 Width=4.0 Etchback=0.50 Laminate Layer 2 8.00 Resin Content 64.3% 3.2-6.0 Copper Plane Bottom 1.30 Opening w=0.0 offset=0.0 Layer Thick Er Loss Tangent Copper Plane Top 1.30 3.20 Laminate Layer 1 8.00 4.20 0.00120 Signal Layer 1 1.35 3.60 0.00120 Laminate Layer 2 8.00 4.20 0.00120 Copper Plane Bottom 1.30 3.20 Rdc_trace_1= 143.64 milliohms/in 20C DC resistance by pixel count: Rdc_trace_1= 139.650 milliohm/in. C = 2.807 pF/in L = 10.527 nH/in. Er = 4.116 Loss_tan = 0.00120 Zo = 61.240 Ohms Delay = 171.895 ps/in. Log file save name: mdtlc_12071641904.txt Log file save name: mdtlc_12071641924.txt Simulation pix map 200 pixels high by 900 pixels wide. 541024 bytes allocated for bmp. INPUT PARAMETERS: Layer Thick Specifications Copper Plane Top 1.30 Opening w=0.0 offset=0.0 Laminate Layer 1 8.00 Resin Content 64.3% 3.2-6.0 Signal Layer 1 1.35 Width=6.0 Etchback=0.50 Laminate Layer 2 8.00 Resin Content 64.3% 3.2-6.0 Copper Plane Bottom 1.30 Opening w=0.0 offset=0.0 Layer Thick Er Loss Tangent Copper Plane Top 1.30 3.20 Laminate Layer 1 8.00 4.20 0.00120 Signal Layer 1 1.35 3.60 0.00120 Laminate Layer 2 8.00 4.20 0.00120 Copper Plane Bottom 1.30 3.20 Rdc_trace_1= 91.41 milliohms/in 20C DC resistance by pixel count: Rdc_trace_1= 88.603 milliohm/in. C = 3.314 pF/in L = 8.948 nH/in. Er = 4.131 Loss_tan = 0.00120 Zo = 51.964 Ohms Delay = 172.202 ps/in. Log file save name: mdtlc_12071642483.txt Log file save name: ________________________________ From: ryansatrom <ryan.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:47:23 AM Subject: [SI-LIST] Stripline Propagation Velocity Hello All- I took some VNA measurements on PCB's manufactured with several different materials. Each PCB material had two 50 Ohm stripline traces on different layers: A trace between two 4 mil cores, and another trace between two 8 mil cores. I expected that the propagation velocity of two traces to be the same, but measuring the propagation delays indicated that they were not (the PCB launch and vias were calculated out.) Of the six different PCB materials that I measured, five of them were faster on the stripline trace between the 4 mil cores. The differences in speeds were outside the range that could be attributed to measurement error or manufacturing tolerances. What can the differences in speeds be attributed to? Thanks, Ryan ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu _______________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MessageLabs (http://www.messagelabs.com) for the presence of computer viruses. _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MessageLabs (http://www.messagelabs.com) for the presence of computer viruses. _______________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu