[SI-LIST] Re: Stripline Propagation Velocity

  • From: r.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:03:23 -0500

Hello All-
Thanks for your feedback.  The resin content is the most likely 
contributor to the difference in results.  I will look into it with our 
manufacturing team.

I'd prefer not to disclose which board materials, but in order to get an 
idea of the results, here are the values that I've measured/calculated 
with the material names removed:

Board #1        4mil (er=3.43; vp=156.8 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.80; vp= 165.1 
ps/in)
Board #2        4mil (er=3.71; vp=163.1 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.86; vp= 166.3 
ps/in)
Board #3        4mil (er=3.61; vp=160.9 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.87; vp= 166.5 
ps/in)
Board #4        4mil (er=3.63; vp=161.4 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.81; vp= 165.2 
ps/in)
Board #5        4mil (er=3.27; vp=153.1 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.44; vp= 157.1 
ps/in)
Board #6        4mil (er=4.08; vp=171.1 ps/in), 8mil (er=3.96; vp= 168.6 
ps/in).

In summary, there is a change of speed of between -3ps/in and +8ps/in, and 
a change in dielectric of between -0.12 and +0.37.

Regards,
Ryan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan Satrom  | Signal Integrity Engineer
Phone: 651-407-7711 | Fax: 651-407-7290
r.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | Skype: satromium

Multitest Contactor Division
4444 Centerville Road, Suite 105
Saint Paul, MN, USA, 55127
http://www.multitest.com



From:
Kirby Goulet <kgoulet@xxxxxxxx>
To:
"ryan.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ryan.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
08/16/2012 10:49 AM
Subject:
[SI-LIST] Re: Stripline Propagation Velocity
Sent by:
si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



Hi Ryan
Here is a report from a impedance calculator.  One case with 4mil cores, 
and two cases with 8mil cores (with two trace widths). All cases the cores 
are Er 4.2 and the resin at 3.6.  This includes a trapezoidal 
cross-section.

The propagation velocities changed.  Not sure if in the amount you 
expected.

-------------------------------
2D Impedance Calculator Program
Version 0.2.1.88
Time: Thu Aug 16 11:36:28 2012
GPL Version 2.0
-------------------------------
Simulation pix map 140 pixels high by 700 pixels wide.
295024 bytes allocated for bmp.
Simulation pix map 120 pixels high by 700 pixels wide.
253024 bytes allocated for bmp.
 
INPUT PARAMETERS:
 
      Layer             Thick   Specifications 
      Copper Plane Top   1.30    Opening w=0.0  offset=0.0
      Laminate Layer 1   4.00    Resin Content  64.3% 3.2-6.0 
        Signal Layer 1   1.35  Width=4.0  Etchback=0.50
      Laminate Layer 2   4.00    Resin Content  64.3% 3.2-6.0 
   Copper Plane Bottom   1.30    Opening w=0.0  offset=0.0
 
      Layer             Thick   Er    Loss Tangent
      Copper Plane Top   1.30  3.20   
      Laminate Layer 1   4.00  4.20    0.00120 
        Signal Layer 1   1.35  3.60    0.00120
      Laminate Layer 2   4.00  4.20    0.00120
   Copper Plane Bottom   1.30  3.20
 
 Rdc_trace_1= 143.64  milliohms/in 20C
 DC resistance by pixel count:
 Rdc_trace_1= 139.650 milliohm/in.
 C          =   3.930 pF/in        L =   7.500 nH/in.
 Er         =   4.106       Loss_tan =   0.00120
 Zo         =  43.685 Ohms     Delay = 171.675 ps/in.
 
Simulation pix map 200 pixels high by 700 pixels wide.
421024 bytes allocated for bmp.
 
INPUT PARAMETERS:
 
      Layer             Thick   Specifications 
      Copper Plane Top   1.30    Opening w=0.0  offset=0.0
      Laminate Layer 1   8.00    Resin Content  64.3% 3.2-6.0 
        Signal Layer 1   1.35  Width=4.0  Etchback=0.50
      Laminate Layer 2   8.00    Resin Content  64.3% 3.2-6.0 
   Copper Plane Bottom   1.30    Opening w=0.0  offset=0.0
 
      Layer             Thick   Er    Loss Tangent
      Copper Plane Top   1.30  3.20   
      Laminate Layer 1   8.00  4.20    0.00120 
        Signal Layer 1   1.35  3.60    0.00120
      Laminate Layer 2   8.00  4.20    0.00120
   Copper Plane Bottom   1.30  3.20
 
 Rdc_trace_1= 143.64  milliohms/in 20C
 DC resistance by pixel count:
 Rdc_trace_1= 139.650 milliohm/in.
 C          =   2.807 pF/in        L =  10.527 nH/in.
 Er         =   4.116       Loss_tan =   0.00120
 Zo         =  61.240 Ohms     Delay = 171.895 ps/in.
 
Log file save name:
mdtlc_12071641904.txt

Log file save name:
mdtlc_12071641924.txt

Simulation pix map 200 pixels high by 900 pixels wide.
541024 bytes allocated for bmp.
 
INPUT PARAMETERS:
 
      Layer             Thick   Specifications 
      Copper Plane Top   1.30    Opening w=0.0  offset=0.0
      Laminate Layer 1   8.00    Resin Content  64.3% 3.2-6.0 
        Signal Layer 1   1.35  Width=6.0  Etchback=0.50
      Laminate Layer 2   8.00    Resin Content  64.3% 3.2-6.0 
   Copper Plane Bottom   1.30    Opening w=0.0  offset=0.0
 
      Layer             Thick   Er    Loss Tangent
      Copper Plane Top   1.30  3.20   
      Laminate Layer 1   8.00  4.20    0.00120 
        Signal Layer 1   1.35  3.60    0.00120
      Laminate Layer 2   8.00  4.20    0.00120
   Copper Plane Bottom   1.30  3.20
 
 Rdc_trace_1= 91.41  milliohms/in 20C
 DC resistance by pixel count:
 Rdc_trace_1=  88.603 milliohm/in.
 C          =   3.314 pF/in        L =   8.948 nH/in.
 Er         =   4.131       Loss_tan =   0.00120
 Zo         =  51.964 Ohms     Delay = 172.202 ps/in.
 
Log file save name:
mdtlc_12071642483.txt

Log file save name:




________________________________
 From: ryansatrom <ryan.satrom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:47:23 AM
Subject: [SI-LIST] Stripline Propagation Velocity
 
Hello All-

I took some VNA measurements on PCB's manufactured with several different 
materials.

Each PCB material had two 50 Ohm stripline traces on different layers:  A 
trace between two 4 mil cores, and another trace between two 8 mil cores.

I expected that the propagation velocity of two traces to be the same, but 
measuring the propagation delays indicated that they were not (the PCB 
launch and vias were calculated out.)

Of the six different PCB materials that I measured, five of them were 
faster on the stripline trace between the 4 mil cores.  The differences in 
speeds were outside the range that could be attributed to measurement 
error or manufacturing tolerances.

What can the differences in speeds be attributed to?

Thanks,
Ryan

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
              http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:    
        //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
        http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at: 
                                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
 


_______________________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MessageLabs (http://www.messagelabs.com) for the presence of computer
viruses. 
_______________________________________________________________________




_______________________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MessageLabs (http://www.messagelabs.com) for the presence of computer
viruses. 
_______________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: