Hi Peter, I would agree with Steve there - the pad sounds not quite right. Normally, the pad size is dependant upon the corresponding pad size on the BGA itself, and is not directly related to the ball size - the idea is to get a symmetrical joint shape to maximise resistance to sheer stresses once the BGA ball has melted, and your pad will probably be smaller than the pad on the BGA. MIGHT not be critical, but could lead to an increase in long term failure rates, particularly in mechanically stressful environments. So, due to the fact that different BGA manufacturers may (will) use different size pads on their BGAs, it is a little difficult, particularly for high volume manufacturing, to generalise. However, I would think somewhere in the region of 16 to 19 mils would be better - obviously, this is not going to fit to your track width requirement, but I would suggest that you reduce the track width and spacing (between tracks, first of all!!!) to 4 mils and take a larger BGA pad. If you do this, but keep to 5 mil spacing to pads (to avoid shorts between tracks and pads in the case of offset solder mask), you will come to a pad size of 17 mils, which, I think, offers a good compromise. If you definitely need 5 mil tracks for whatever reasons, like impedance, I would STILL make them 4 mils in the area of the BGA pads, and then expand once you are out of that area - the short track lengths inside the BGA area are likely, in most normal commercial applications, to have only a negligble impact on total impedance effects. Hope this helps! ____________________________________ Sol Tatlow, M.Eng. (Oxon) ProDesign Electronic & CAD Layout GmbH Product Developer Albert-Mayer-Str. 16 D-83052 Bruckmuehl Phone: +49 (0) 8062-808-302 Fax: +49 (0) 8062-808-333 Mailto:sol.tatlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.prodesign-europe.com ____________________________________=20 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = Im Auftrag von Pang Ning Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005 12:13 An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: morris_yu@xxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [SI-LIST] Search for the paper about minimum BGA pad size in = PCB Dear Expert, I encountered a problem about BGA pad size in PCB. The actual ball size = is 0.6mm, and ball pitch is 1.0mm. We plan to route two 5mil traces = between two adjacent pads, and reserve over 5mil spacing for = trace/trace, trace/pad(or via). But in this way the BGA pad size in PCB = will be only 14mil. I'm wondering if 14mil BGA pad is too small for mass production. Is = there any paper that demonstrates the guideline for BGA ball size vs. = minimum pad size in PCB? Can anyone provide me the linkage for the = paper? Thanks in advance! Best Regards, Peter Pang ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu