[SI-LIST] Re: Lower epsilon achieves lower crosstalk
- From: Young <long.0.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ZHENGGANG CHENG <zhenggang.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:48 +0800
Zhenggang
Could you tell us why there is no FEXT in the case of stripline?
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 03:25, ZHENGGANG CHENG <zhenggang.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Hi Liu,
> Xtalk analysis is very different for microstrip and stripline cases, and it
> also depends what xtalk you are talking about such as FEXT or NEXT.
>
> For stripline, there is no FEXT, and NEXT proportional to Cm/C. So in this
> case, lower Er, to keep the same impedance, H will be decreased, so Cm/C
> will be smaller.
>
> For microstrip case, FEXT is proportional to Cm/C-Lm/L, and NEXT is
> proportional to Cm/C+Lm/L. In your case, Lm/L is becoming larger (Lm is not
> changing, L is decreased due to smaller H), Cm/C may be smaller, then FEXT
> will become larger due to lower Er.
>
> Zhenggang CHENG
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Liu Xike <xike.silist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > We could achieve lower crosstalk by using dielectric with lower
> > permittivity, while keeping *Z0* as a constant.
> >
> >
> > I'm new in SI, my understanding about this question is:
> >
> >
> >
> > If we use dielectric with lower permittivity while keeping *Z0* as a
> > constant.
> >
> > We need to reduce *h *to maintain a constant *C*, because *C*>
> *epsilon***w*
> > /*h*, and *Z0*=1/*vp*/*C*.
> >
> >
> >
> > Since *Z0* = sqrt(*L/C*), to keep* Z0* as a constant, the stripe line
> need
> > to adjust it?s current distribution to maintain a constant *L*.
> >
> >
> >
> > Considering the loop area decrease because *h* is reduced, the current
> > distribution should be more tighter to maintain a constant *L*.
> >
> >
> >
> > Finally the tighter current distribution on the returning pass results in
> > the reduction of the cross talk.
> >
> >
> >
> > Are these correct? I will appreciate your help
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> > For help:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >
> > List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.net
> >
> > List archives are viewable at:
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >
> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
