On Friday 01 March 2002 17:51, steve weir wrote: # But, as DC Sessions is happy to point out, LVDS is pretty old, power # hungry, and increasingly unfriendly to modern core and I/O voltage # technology. I think the real question is how appropriate LVDS is as a # forward going standard. That's maybe a little strong. LVDS is admirably well-suited to connecting chassis with poor-but-not-vanishing ground integrity. That's a problem that isn't going away until optical interconnect takes over. I'm just not a fan of it for local interconnect where ground integrity is good and the economics don't support using external SLVS-to-LVDS translators. -- | The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. | | Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. | +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --------------+ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu