Dear Sogo In my simulation about SSN, I really see the saturation. Have you set the lossy dielectric? Best Regards Zhangkun 2005.6.7 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sogo Hsu" <sogo.hsu@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:01 PM Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Far-end crosstalk over long PCB trace > Dear Istvan and Craig, > > Thank you for your response. However, Far-end crosstalk is indeed > getting saturation. You can easily find lots of related information > by Googling "crosstalk saturation". Dr. Zhen Mu has several papers > addressed on this topic. Elie Michael Issa also mentioned the > saturation length condition. Typically, the far-end crosstalk is > assumed to be proportional to coupled length. However, the > estimation of linear far-end crosstalk is correct only if the system > is weakly coupled transmission. From conservation point of view, it > is not reasonable that the coupled energy is increased without > limitation. Meanwhile, the saturation phenomenon can be explained by > Modal Velocity. The mechanism of "crosstalk" is the result of > velocity discrepancy of different modes. > > BRs, > > Sogo Hsu, Ph. D. > Foxconn > > --- In si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Istvan Novak <istvan.novak@xxxx> > wrote: > > Near-end crosstalk saturates at a length matching the > > quarter wavelength in the coupled section. Far-end > > crosstalk, however, does not saturate any 'fixed' length; > > the saturation depends also on the coupling. The weaker > > the coupling, the longer coupled length you need for saturation. > > > > Regards, > > > > Istvan Novak > > SUN Microsystems > > > > Sogo Hsu wrote: > > > > >Hi, SI Gurus, > > > > > >It seems a old question in SI-list. Right now, we evaluated the > > >crosstalk noise cased by neighboring aggressors. As we know, the > far- > > >end crosstalk noise is proportional to coupled length and will be > > >saturation if the coupled etching length is greater than > constraint > > >length. The phenomenon can be easily explained by the discrepancy > of > > >modal velocity in coupled-transmission line. However, we found > the far- > > >end crosstalk simulated by Hspice, PCB SI and SPEED XP etc., > will not > > >behave the saturation even the coupled length is 100in. In my > opinion, > > >it is not reasonable. Pls help me to verify the solver. Thank you > in > > >advance. > > > > > >* I briefly describe the scenarios as below > > >3-line coupled transmission line > > >Tr=1ns > > > > > >Best Regards, > > >Sogo Hsu > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu