[SI-LIST] Re: Doping effects.

  • From: "Tabatchnick, Justin" <justin.tabatchnick@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:00:14 -0800

Hi Ed;

I don't understand what you mean by the doping becoming  degenerate and
acting like a metal can you be more explicit.  If I am correct the
dopant does not have free electrons (they still reside in the valence
band) and a metal does (electrons reside in the conduction band).

Thanks

Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sayre III [mailto:esayre3@xxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:45 AM
To: rfengg@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Doping effects.


Hi George,
    A question right up my alley!  When you dope a semiconductor you are

just providing more free electrons or holes, dependant on the dopant, to

reduce the resistivity.  This is illustrated by the increases the drift=20
current through the material., At some point the doping becomes
degenerate,=20
at which time the material is less silicon and more dopant.  Basically=20
increasing the doping of a semiconductor makes it behave more like a
metal,=20
to the point of degeneracy then it changes back..  This method of=20
degenerate doping can also be used to create an insolating layer in a=20
silicon substrate for isolation.
    There are a very limited number of pure metals that are=20
superconductors, Niobium the most commonly used and the one with the=20
highest transition temperature, 4K.  Others are Aluminum and Tin.  The=20
transition temperature is the temperature at which a material becomes=20
superconducting.  If you look at a resistivity versus temperature plot
of=20
most materials and extrapolate to 0 K the resistivity does not go to
zero=20
at 0 K, even superconductors above Tc.  A superconductor will look like
a=20
normal metal then transition, in a step wise fashion(the transition=20
region), to 0 resistance, at Tc, under DC conditions.
   Since we use the interconnects of a chip, package, or system at=20
frequencies other than DC there is also another interesting=20
behavior.  Superconductors actually have measurable loss at frequencies=20
above DC.  These losses become significant and then pass those of cooled

Copper or Aluminum at about 100GHz for temperature of 77K (Liquid=20
Nitrogen).  So the interesting thing is that cryo-cooled normal metals=20
actually perform better at high frequencies than high temperature or low

temperature superconductors.  Ramo, Whinnery and VanDuzer, 3rd edition,=20
have an excellent plot of this on page 152 figure 3.16b.
   BTW, this was one of the areas of my research.  Hope this helps.

         Regards

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               NORTH EAST SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC
                             -------------------------------------=20

                         "High Performance Engineering & Design"
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Dr. Edward Sayre 3rd            e-mail: esayre3@xxxxxxxx
  NESA, Inc.                              http://www.nesa.com/
  5 Lan Drive, Suite 200          Tel  +1.978.392-8787 x 218
  Westford, MA 01886 USA       Fax +1.978.392-8686
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

At 03:30 PM 3/21/2003 +1100, you wrote:

>  Hi all,
>           If doping increases the conductivity of Silicon , why cant
we=20
> attain superconductivity with heavy doping of a material? Whats the=20
> phenomenon that limits the conductivity if we actually do increase=20
> carriers by doping?
>
>Thanks and regards,
>George.
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year.
>http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=3Dplus&ref=3Dlmtplus
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:    =20
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
 =20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: