Hi Kevin; Thanks for your comments. In ASIC design we generally add thousands of small decaps (perhaps 10s of thousands is more accurate). To model the effect of capacitance we assume they all connected to one node (between power and ground) and then we do transient simulation to understand the mitigation effect of noise. I was looking for reasonable numerical accuracy. I was always wondered if assumption of equipotential or none eqipotential has any significant effect in amount/number of decaps that I add to silicon (Hope I am making sense here). You mentioning usually simple corrections to the equipotential solution will suffice. I am sort of looking for some fudge factor from engineering point of view (i.e less math and complication :-)). Can it be like add/subtract 5 or 10 per percent to equipotential case and be done with? I understand that an easy answer may not be possible but I was sort of thinking along those lines. Hope this helps.. thanks. Regards; Don Pakbaz From: "Kevin G. Rhoads" <krhoads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: 11/28/2014 12:58 PM Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors Behavior in None Equipotential Surface Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx In one dimension, you would be looking at an RC or RLC transmission line. When a conductor is not equipotential, usually that can be modelled as impedance - resistance, inductance or both together. In two dimensions, somewhat more complicated, but still separation of variables for the two space and one time or frequency in your model. Circuit models of 1D RC transmission lines exist in electrochemistry, e.g., Warburg. How detailed do your numerics need to be? Usually, simple corrections to the equipotential solution will suffice, but not always. Sincerely Kevin G. Rhoads, Ph.D. On 11/28/2014 12:24 PM, Faraydon Pakbaz wrote: > > Dear Experts; > > We know that theoritically capacitors in parallel add in equipotential > surface. What about > None equipotential surface? Is there any good way to approximate the > capacitors behavior > in None Equipotential surface? This question arises from considering the > total capacitor required > at chip level. Even though assumption often made that Chip/Silicon level is > equipotential, we > know that in reality is not due to various high frequncy cores running at > silicon. Thanks in advance > for comments and guidance. > > Regards; > > Don Pakbaz > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu