[SI-LIST] Better choice for AC Coulplilng(calrification)
- From: zanglinyuan <zanglinyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hariharan@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:00:41 +0800
Hi.
typically LVPECL to LVPECL interface (or others)using AC coupling as follows :
There are pullup/pulldown resistors not illustrated.
The first diagram use one capacitor and the second diagram use two capacitors
to coupling
the interface.
I wann'a to know which one is better?
What's the priority for each case?
____ ___
|TX |-------||---------|RX |
|___|-------||---------|___|
___ ___
|TX |----||---------||---|RX |
|___|----||---------||---|___|
----- Original Message -----
From: "hariharan" <hariharan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <zanglinyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Better choice for AC coupling
>
> could you please make it clear. I dont understand the question
>
> do you meant 2 cards are sitting on the backplane with a capacitance for
> crosstalk minimization in between?
>
> kindly ellaborate.
>
> regards
> Hariharan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of zanglinyuan
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:24 PM
> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Better choice for AC coupling
>
>
> Hi.all
> we often use AC coupling circuit for differential signal especially
> different level type.
>
> Now I'm designing a system interface as following:
> driver card-------backplane---------receiver card
>
> No doubt ,we need at least one capacitor series in the path to realize
> interconnect.
> Some vendor also recommend using two capacitors as following:
>
> driver card----||---backplane-----||----receiver card
>
> which is better to use one or two capacitors?
> What's the priority for each case?
>
> for above system ,when use one capacitor,where is better to place?
>
> By the way,The simulation result at receiver card is no difference when we
> place one or two capacitor series in the circuit.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
