Hi Dan, You are perfectly right: a) The coupling capacitor between power plane and ground plane near the v= ia is missing. b) The perfectly conducting boundary box must be dragged away far enough from the ends of the TL not to influence the ports. c) Free space approximation for the boundary is even better. (but the Algorithm is more complicated and calculation time increases) Thank You Thomas -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Dan Swanson Gesendet: Montag, 1. April 2002 16:26 An: 'beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx'; Dan Swanson; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [SI-LIST] Re: PCB via simulations Hi Thomas, If trace 1 is referenced to the power plane, and trace 2 is referenced to the ground plane, this is even worse. In the real board, the only way for RF return current to get between the two is capacitive coupling between the planes or discrete RF bypass caps on the board, near the transition. If you take this same geometry and run it on an em code who's fundamental formulation is laterally open (no box walls) like Zeland IE3D or Agilent Momentum, you will get a radically different answer above 1 or 2 GHz. (Return loss (reflections) will be much worse.) If you take Kevin's model and pull the power and ground planes away from the box walls on two sides, you will get a different answer, which is heading towards the right answer. As always, depends on freq range, etc that you are interested in. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Beneken [mailto:beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:00 AM To: DSWANSON@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: AW: [SI-LIST] Re: PCB via simulations=3D20 Hi Dan, ok, simulators need a restricted calculation volume, because mems =3D resources are restricted too. One can select a perfect conducting box or a free =3D space boundary box. You may want the box far enough from your objects of =3D interest. (This is the week point in Kevins setup: really far enough?) I don't want to defend Kevins paper, but I've seen power planes in his model. This is his layer stack: 18.5 mils -------------------------------- perfect conducting =3D boundary box |p1 via | 13 - 13.5 mils |->-------------| | trace 1 11 - 11.5 mils --------------- | -------------| power plane | | 7 - 7.5 mils --------------- | -------------| ground plane 5 - 5.5 mils | |------------<-| trace 2 | p2| 0 -------------------------------| perfect conducting =3D boundary box He defined discrete ports between the ends of the traces and where the planes meet the bounding box ("currents wrap around"). Looks quite ok =3D for me. Dan, please have a second look and correct me if I'm wrong. I admit =3D a wider bounding box would be better (I do have a Gigabyte-RAM =3D workstation). Regards, Thomas -----Urspr=3DFCngliche Nachricht----- Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Dan Swanson Gesendet: Montag, 1. April 2002 14:44 An: 'beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx'; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [SI-LIST] Re: PCB via simulations It looks like the boundaries of the simulation space are perfectly conducting walls. They might also be some kind of low impedance absorbing boundaries. In either case, there is no path for return current in this model, other than the walls of the simulator. This is a common mistake is em simulation of multilayer transitions. The results will be overly optimistic. In a real board, the return path will typically be some random combination of ground vias near this signal via. Dan Dan Swanson EMAIL: d.swanson@xxxxxxxx Forem USA PHONE: 978-834-4085 37 South Hunt Road FAX: 978-388-7077 Amesbury, MA 01913 -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Beneken [mailto:beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:10 AM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] PCB via simulations Hi All, I ran across PCB via simulations by Kevin Thomas of Cray Inc., =3D September 1997. Updated March 2001. http://lc.cray.com/apps/xvia/ hope it's useful for someone, (lost that thread ...) Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu