Han Li, you can model this accurately in SPICE and explore it. Using the SPICE FFT feature you can examine the frequency spectra. I modeled what I think your system looks like using a shunt 6.8 - 12 pF capacitor having a series inductance of 2 nH. The driver is a CMOS driver having a rise time of 350 ps and a series inductance of 4 nH. There are two places that I measured the current: The RF current in the driver and the RF current flowing in the receiver. In any event, I see that some frequencies are improved and some are made worse by the addition of the capacitor. And the signal integrity is definitely harmed by the poor impedance match caused by the capacitor. However, if the signals at the receiver are such that they are 'legal' signals under all conditions with the capacitor then the system should work just fine. You could leave pads on the PCB to add the caps (or remove them) if your board fails EMC. The downside is the additional board area required. Dave Cuthbert SI/EMC Consultant (and all analog design from low noise to 100's of kW. Antennas too) On Jan 1, 2008 6:48 PM, Han Li <jasonleehan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, experts. > I am doing a board design, on which I have a 66MHz (3.3V), and a > 25MHz(3.3) oscillator. I used seriese termination for these clock lines. > topoloy like this > [A]--[seriesRes]----------long line-------------[Load] > [A] is clock source, then resistor , then transmission line ,then load at > end. > But our EMC consultant recommended me to add a cap between series Resi and > GND. The cap and resistor are located very close. so topoloy now like > this: > [A]----[seriesRes]----------long line-------------[Load] > | > ---- > ---- ( capacitor) > | > GND > He didnot recommentd cap's value, only said it may help EMC test. > I understand that such a cap can increase clock rising time and reduce > frequency spectra. BUT, donnot we creat a matched transmission line using > series resistor? Why intentionally add a cap to destroy such a matched > line? > Can I really get a good EMC result? > Could anyone provide a deeped and more detailed explanation on this? > Thank you very much. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu