I reached that decision this year Donna.....
lot of errors there too.
Molly
-----Original Message-----
From: dmrad <dmrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: danielleweitz52 <danielleweitz52@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: cnnpmm2 <cnnpmm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; marhaven <marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
showgsd-l digest users <Showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, Feb 5, 2017 11:53 am
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The REVIEW
I have to chime in on this. I am a long-time GSDCA member. I no longer show in
confirmation and thought seriously about whether or not to renew my membership
this year.
No surprise-- I renewed mainly to keep up with show results, including the
PICTURES.
I am magnifying-glass age. However, the ONLY time I need one is when I want to
SEE the pictures in this new format.
I think I know what my renewal decision will be next year.
Donna Radich in NC
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 5, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Danielle Weitz <danielleweitz52@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the Nov/Dec issue I did have to use a magnifying glass on a couple of pages
besides my glasses and now I still have not received my January issue. Not
happy in NJ
Danielle
From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of cnnpmm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 12:19 PM
To: marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'showgsd-l digest users'
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The REVIEW
Carolyn writes: "It is the pictures of these beautiful dogs that bring us back
to the Review over and over until the next one arrives, as we look at winners,
stud dogs, upcoming stars, check out Breed improvement, bloodlines, etc."
And this is exactly why I cherish my Review collection from 1947 - forward; the
pictures of the dogs!
I don't understand why the format of the Review was changed when the new editor
came on board. What was wrong with the old format? I hope that the "problems"
with the Review are being addressed and we'll see improvement in the next issue.
Paulette
