[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: [Norton AntiSpam]Troll and change
- From: "Penny & Bill" <Ketchy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <medusasmom1@xxxxxxxxx>, <inflight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 15:35:09 -0500
Great post Tami! People need to listen, observe and listen some more.
People need to understand that their dogs have faults. There are NO perfect
dogs.
Penny in NC
The Farm Dog Forever
Read the standard! Look at your dogs honestly as though they were stuffed
animals lol not your best friend for a minute. Try to see how and where they
measure up. Ya know what... Its OK if some things need work! This is where
you sit down, realize what you have, what you need, what you want & whats
important to YOU! Then ideally ask a few people you know have consistently
been producing good dogs(ie: Dogs that other breeders besides THEM consider
good dogs ) to give you their opinion of your dog or dogs. A dedicated
breeder can an in my opinion should be able to look at another persons
kennel of dogs and give you a decent idea of something you can work on.
Medusasmom...forever
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Kathaleen Strong" <inflight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Our standard is good, but vague in many areas. It was written about sixty
> years ago with little change since then. Many of our problems today lie
> in
> areas not addressed, such as upper arm. When it states that the upper arm
> joins the shoulder blade at about a right angle, it means that the upper
> arm
> must return at the same angle to the ground as the blade. Since it does
> not
> state this directly, many do not seem to understand this relationship.
> We gain some-we lose some, but we must stress problem areas so that we
> have
> nothing but gain/positive change.
> Carolyn
>
>
> Carolyn:
>
> I totally agree, most do not understand this. The issue is.. most are not
> willing to listen to what you or I or others have to say, because what we
> have to say indicates that their animal has a fault -- and a majoirity of
> people involved in this industry today look at admitting a fault of their
> dog is a fault of themselves, and therefore it is unacceptable.
>
> > We are saying the same thing using different words -- but we've seen
> > what is
> correct and what is not. Both of us are willing to stand by our opinions,
> even if they differ slightly, and see the other as having merit. This is
> also an issue with a large group of dog fanciers today. They cannot and
> often will not see another opinion as relevant.
>
>
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
