[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: BALLOT HERE INSTRUCTIONS COULD BE MISLEADING

  • From: <almanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <LeBrowngsd@xxxxxxx>, <VPREZHMF@xxxxxxx>, <willimar@xxxxxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:26:37 -0400

I have and always will be for the one vote method for judges...............I 
still do it even given the opportunity to vote for 3 i don't want the vote 
diluted for my favorite...........
Amy Safdir
Almanya Shepherds
www.almanyagsd.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <LeBrowngsd@xxxxxxx>
To: <VPREZHMF@xxxxxxx>; <willimar@xxxxxxxxxx>; <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: BALLOT HERE INSTRUCTIONS COULD BE MISLEADING


>
> In a message dated 9/17/2007 4:22:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> VPREZHMF@xxxxxxx writes:
> the  trouble with using the weighted system. I thought we were  going
> back  to one vote-one judge and the judge that gets the most  votes gets
> Intersex ,the judge that gets the next highest gets Dogs,and the   last
> highest gets
> bitches . So much simpler and less mistakes Helen  Miller  Fisher
> Tried to get this done when I was on the board and it failed by one  vote.
>
> Last years judge would have been different hand we not use the weight 
> ballot.
>
> The judge who judged intersex did not have highest number of number "1"
> votes.
>
> Not a good way to elect judges, should be the one vote.
>
> Look what happens with a weighted ballot:
>
>                      Judge  A                    Judge  B
> Judge  C
> #1 votes         200 X 3=  600        201 X 3=  603                186  X 
> 3=
> 558
> #2 votes         137 X 2=  274        135 X 2=  270                140  X 
> 2=
> 280
> #3 votes          87 X  1=  87           89 X 1=  89 
> 125
> X 1= 125
> Totals                        961                        962
>           963
>
> Judge C would get intersex but yet Judge C got least number of number 1
> votes.
> His total when you consider all three is the highest but look how many 
> votes
> he got in the number 3 spot.
>
> Lee Brown
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new at 
> http://www.aol.com
>
>
> ============================================================================
> POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the 
> original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or 
> FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the 
> original author  AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
>
> ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
> MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
> PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
> FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL 
> BE PROSECUTED.
>
> For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
> ============================================================================ 

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: