Yes, Cath, I thought so too, for both styles she suggested. Perhaps she was
aiming for at least getting the facts and sources down as a first step? Or
maybe their society's publications are like that.
Sue
________________________________
From: sagwdg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <sagwdg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
rcmp72 rcmp72 <rcmp72@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 January 2020 03:30
To: sagwdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <sagwdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [sagwdg] Re: SAGWDG,
Thanks Sue for this talk. I found it very interesting but did wonder if a book
produced in the style suggested mightn't be a bit boring? Topic for further
conversations maybe?
Cath Philps
------ Original Message ------
From: "s stenning" <sstenning@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "sagwdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sagwdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 17 Jan, 2020 At 4:01 PM
Subject: [sagwdg] Re: SAGWDG,
Happy New Year Everyone!
Rootstech have a video of a presentation from last year by Penelope Stratton
from the New England Historic Genealogical Society called Writing and
Publishing a family History in 10 steps. It goes for about an hour and
contains some good tips.
W
www.rootstech.org/blog/writing-and-publishing-a-family-history-10-steps?et_cid=1581932&et_rid=111762438&linkid=blog+3&cid=em-rt-9488<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rootstech.org%2Fblog%2Fwriting-and-publishing-a-family-history-10-steps%3Fet_cid%3D1581932%26et_rid%3D111762438%26linkid%3Dblog%2B3%26cid%3Dem-rt-9488&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4e575087a7484a93a30b08d79bc6f31d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637149151096968838&sdata=soC14tLZFU54VxloDVEGxpwhzqfQn9PZfIHXwSvWKiw%3D&reserved=0>
Sue
