[sac-board] Re: Insurance
- From: "Erdmann, Robert E" <robert.e.erdmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:54:49 -0700
Thanks for asking the question, Peter - I was just sitting here
wondering the same thing.
/Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Argenziano [mailto:pargenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:56 AM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Insurance
If the policy doesn't cover star parties and has exclusions on the
meeting
room... what _is_ covered?
By comparison, our policy covers the meeting room and club-sponsored
events
at seven specific locations.
Peter
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Paul Dickson" <dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <SAC-Board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:11 AM
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Insurance
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:45:23 -0700, Jack Jones wrote:
>
> > This is ridiculous. Did any new riders or extra coverage that we
didn't
have
> > before get "added on" since last payment?
>
> I found the policy that was mailed to me late July. $2 of that
increase
> was from coverage of acts of terrorism. But there's now mention how
they
> got from $306 (~ $3.4/member) to $498.
>
> I have the policy and the agent's office is 21st Ave and Northern.
Anyone
> willing to sit down with them?
>
> When I sent my change of address, they thought our policy was
cancelled.
> It took them a month to get through to the billing department at the
> insuring company to confirm that we were paid up.
>
> Since our policy does not cover the star parties, and we rent a class
room
> for one meeting a month, I don't we need to pay so much. It's not
like we
> are the only people exposed to that room (there are excusions on the
> policy for fungi and bacteria).
>
> -Paul
>
>
Other related posts:
