[ryerson_index] Re: What is wrong with this indexing?
- From: Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ryerson_index@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:12:31 +1100
On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:52:17 +1000
John Graham <johngrah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we consider "Nana Steemy" to be a nickname used outside the
family, then what else is wrong with the way this notice has been
indexed:
STEEMSON, Frances Marie (Nana Steemy);21SEP2016;(91);F;;
SCHLECHT, Frances Marie (Nana Steemy);;;F;see STEEMSON, Frances
Marie (Nana Steemy);
John
I sent a reply to this, but it has got lost in the Christmas rush.
That is why we call it Post Office Protocol. :)
Here it is again, improved:
If.
But that isn't what John was asking. What ELSE is wrong?
A case came up years ago. When she was Miss SCHLECHT, she was neither
a Steemson nor a Nana.
Omit "Nana Steemy" from the Previous name.
In my family tree, a Laidlaw was a grandmother at 8. But at 8, she
wasn't yet a Laidlaw.
Doug.
--
Mageia release 5 (Official) for x86_64
running 4.4.36-desktop-2.mga5 with DE=Xfce4
Other related posts:
