[ryerson_index] Re: What is wrong with this indexing?

  • From: <laingjones@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ryerson_index@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:08:52 +1100

I would drop the "Nana' bit altogether. She has two names and surely no one is going to look for "Nana".

Monica

-----Original Message----- From: Doug Laidlaw
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 7:04 PM
To: ryerson_index@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ryerson_index] Re: What is wrong with this indexing?

On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:52:17 +1000
John Graham <johngrah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If we consider "Nana Steemy" to be a nickname used outside the
family, then what else is wrong with the way this notice has been
indexed:

>STEEMSON, Frances Marie (Nana Steemy);21SEP2016;(91);F;;
>, , Frances Marie (Nana Steemy);;;F;see STEEMSON, Frances
>Marie (Nana Steemy);

John




If.

But that isn't what John was asking.  What ELSE is wrong?

A case came up years ago.  When she was Miss SCHLECHT, she was neither
a Steemson nor a Nana.

In my family tree, a Laidlaw was a grandmother at 8.  But at 8, she
wasn't yet a Laidlaw.

Doug.

--
Mageia release 5 (Official) for x86_64
running 4.4.36-desktop-2.mga5 with DE=Xfce4

Other related posts: