[rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V7 #201
- From: gramario <gramario@xxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:17:21 +0200
Oops. Just saw the price. I misread it as $1,999, but I see it is $19,999. Ah,
well, that rules that out then.
Sorry for wasting your time, folks.
On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:58, gramario wrote:
> Hallo,
> At the risk of being deemed OT and incurring the wrath of long-standing and
> esteemed members, I add a footnote to the scanning issue. Due to the valuable
> comments posted on the forum, I am considering the pros and cons of a Beseler
> enlarger (still in production) and the Pacific Image 6x6 (suggested by Kirk),
> albeit the cost here is high, although perhaps not as high as losing my
> precious decades-old negatives.
> Strangely enough, I got an e-mail on the 19th of October from
> hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx pointing out the merits of the Hasselblad
> Flextight5 scanner. Part of the blurb states: "Hasselblad is commmited to
> both worlds of photography - the analogue and the digital. Therewith, it is
> not surprising that Hasselblad also offers some professional high-end
> scanners with which it is possible to transfer analogic photos to the digital
> world in the best quality." They also point out that many of the images which
> are most precious to us do not orginate from the digital format. To process
> them into digital with the maximum result possible a scanner is needed that
> guarantees the highest possible resolution, independent of the original
> format, and that moreover maintains the quality of the image absolutely
> intact. I must say it is refreshing to hear a manufacturer talking about
> analogic at all. Of course, I am still unsure as to whether this would solve
> my black and white and grain question. I welcome comments if anyone knows
> more or has any test results re. the scanners mentioned above.
> Thanks,
> gram
Other related posts:
