Here is a flickr-link to the picture, that shows without the frame: http://flic.kr/p/deUMYC Hope this works. Uwe @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 2012/9/28 Uwe Wolfgang Steinke <paintingwithlenses@xxxxxxxxx> > Yes, yes, yes! It was great fun outside hoping to have better results! > Well, I didn't really care which films I had preloaded - so I filled two > T-max B&W ISO 100 with scenes of an old bridge in our town - the new > battery had no problem at all with the two films plus autofocussing (no big > deal with infinity - ok so I forced it to focus, just to see, if the > cameras correct focus is real sharp. > On Monday I'll bring them to my favorite photo laboratory to get them > developed as fast as possible. > > It was so crazy this morning - the frame just snapped in and > fitted perfectly... > > I'll give you details on how the testprints look like. > > Uwe > > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > > > > > 2012/9/28 John Wild <JWild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Great news, have fun and let us know how you get on. >> >> John >> >> >> >> On 28/09/2012 11:43, "Uwe Wolfgang Steinke" <paintingwithlenses@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> I got the missing part for my 6008AF - unbelievable! It was part of the >> set for the 4,5x6-magazine - the seller did not mention a word about it - >> strange but lucky indeed! >> >> This film-guiding-frame has to be taken out of the 6008 if you use the >> 4,5x6 magazine, so he probably sold camera and magazine separate. Maybe >> just theses two sets - one coming from Bratislava and the other from Sopot, >> Polen - nearly 1000km apart. - who knows. >> >> Now the time has come to test the 6008AF in detail! >> >> Uwe >> >> > -- Uwe Wolfgang Steinke