I have the Triotar on an Ikoflex 1, and another (85mm f4) on a short tele for Contax. The Ikoflex is doubtful; the Contax lens gives me excellent work. Both are uncoated glass. Peter Nebergall On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 09:50:44 -0400 Eric <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Neil: > > > I have read some reports on Rolleicords where they implied that > anything with > > the Triotar lens was inadequate. > > What design is the Triotar anyway? A Cooke Triplet? > > I have had a 'Cord II with Triotar and I am satisfied with its > performance. I > > am not enlarging the negatives to any extreme degree. > > What are the limits of the Triotar? > > > It is a Taylor-type triplet. This type of lens is extremely > sensitive to the > specific design, execution and individual variation of what's on > your > particular camera. That said, all things being equal, you would be > hard > pressed to see the difference between a triplet and a tessar-type > away from > the corners, and corner performance for a good triplet is fine if > well > stopped down. > > I like to shoot heads with a good triplet wide open... > > > Eric Goldstein > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list