[rollei_list] Re: "There is a 220 Rollei T" (BS!)

  • From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:11:30 -0700

Jim

The Rolleikin was set for VERTICAL 24x36 exposures.  The Spezial T kit
was for HORIZONTAL 24x36.  I have the frame/mask for that.

It is still not for 220 film!

Jerry

Jim Somberg wrote:

> According to my two Rollei T's, the film pressure plate is settable to either 
>  6X6 cm or 24X36MM, the latter with a Rolleikin, of course.
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: David Seifert
>   To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 6:34 PM
>   Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "There is a 220 Rollei T"
>
>   Ardeshir Mehta wrote:
>
>   >On Friday, April 22, 2005, at 07:02  PM, David Seifert wrote:
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >>Marc,
>   >>
>   >>You were only partially in error. The units in question were equipped
>   >>with a 24 frame counter. The camera still used 120 film but produced
>   >>24 smaller (24x36?) on the film via a masking system. We went through
>   >>this last year in more detail than anyone cares to recall.
>   >>
>   >>Best Regards,
>   >>David
>   >>
>   >>
>   >
>   >Oh? This is interesting! Are you sure the prints were as small as 24x36
>   >mm? Could they have been 30x60 mm?
>   >
>   >A.
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   Ardeshir,
>
>   Just for you, I look this up again.  According to Prochnow in Rollei
>   Report 2 page 409 there were 250 units of this type built in June 1961.
>   He notes that these were "Direktverkauf, nicht gelistet", direct sale,
>   no price listed.  I interpret that to mean that these were a custom
>   order batch.  The customer is not mentioned.  They used 120 film and
>   produced either 12 6x6 images per roll or 24 24x36 images per roll using
>   the special mask kit.  Thus, they had a 12/24 frame counter.
>
>   For the record, the standard model of that run (56,000 units) came with
>   a 12/16 frame counter equipped to do 12 or 16 exposures per 120 roll.
>   The mask kit produced 16 4.5x5 images.
>
>   Thus spake Prochnow!
>
>   David


Other related posts: