[rollei_list] Re: Rollei prices in 1954
- From: ERoustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:15:22 -0400
That's great! So what would these prices look like today?
Elias
On Oct 12, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Carlos Manuel Freaza wrote:
I have uploaded to the web the 1954 Burleigh Brooks
Inc. (official F&H distributor for USA). As Richard
commented, the prices difference between Rolleicord
and Rolleiflex models were significant and this was
the reason the Rolleiflex Standard Neu was
manufactured on 1939 and the Rolleiflex T from 1958,
the purpose was to fill the price jump between
Rolleicord and Rolleiflex with an intermediate model:
http://silveremulsion.blogspot.com/
All the best
Carlos
--- Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
escribió:
Yes Richard, however German and American economies
were and are different. Prochnow gives the prices
for
Germany on 1950 for the III and on 1953 for the
Rolleicord IV in German Marks; I only have the
official Burleigh Brooks Inc. retail prices for USA
in
dollars on 1954 for the Rolleicord IV and my
reasoning
is simple, if Jim had a Rolleicord III he bought on
1952 costing $149.50 and a Rolleicord IV Xenar lens
costed $149.50 on 1954, Jim's Rolleicord III could
have a Xenar lens.
According a new Jim's message he is not sure if the
camera was a Rolleicord III or IV because he doesn't
remember the exact year he bought the camera, and
then
it's difficult to know the model without the camera
serial number really.-
All the best
Carlos
--- Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
escribió:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Manuel Freaza"
<cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:59 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Limit of Rolleicord
Triotar,
prices
Richard K. wrote a good point, the camera price.
I
have an original 1954 list price from Burleigh
Brooks
Inc.,10 West 46th Street New York 36, N.Y, that
I
bought from Craig cameras because it contains
the
2.8C
prices, if your camera costed 149.50$, this is
the
exact price for the 1954 Rolleicord IV with
Xenar
lens
and ever ready case, and then it's almost sure
your
camera was a Rolleicord III with Xenar lens and
ever
ready case, a Rolleicord III with Triotar lens
was
cheaper clearly. In other words, if your 1952
Rolleicord III camera had identical price
regarding
the newer Rolleicord IV with Xenar lenses, your
Rolleicord III had Xenar lenses too.-
All the best
Carlos
Remember that at the time price fixing of
products was
legal and common. Discounts were often given by
dealers but
could not be advertised.
Prochnow gives prices in DM for the time the
cameras were
released. While converting these prices to U.S.
ones
can not
be done directly the _ratio_ is interesting.
Model III Triotar DM 248
Model III Xenar DM 268
MOdel IV Xenar DM 338
For comparison, the prices he gives for the
Rolleiflex 3.5A
(Automat MX) in the same period are:
Jena Tessar or Opton Tessar DM 510
Xenar DM 490
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
