Interesting comparison Elias, thank you, however the comparisons are digital vs digital since the film has been scanned, anyway considering the cameras price and age difference, film is good. As I wrote several times, it would be stupid a position against the digital image today, even film users like me are using digital means to scan the negs, slides and prints and digital cameras are a valuable workhorse, but film is still the more safe way to keep your images for the next century and images based on film don't need computer memory and don't need a file format to be upgraded.- All the best Carlos --- eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx escribió: > > > really do think my low light pictures using a > Canon EOS 1Ds Mk2 are > > better than I get from fast film anyway > > I think the list members would get a kick out of the > following: > http://www.kenrockwell.com/olympus/trip-35.htm > > Elias > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging > into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > __________________________________________________ Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ¡Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list