[rollei_list] Re: Maxwell screens and Rollei popularity
- From: Stan Yoder <s.yoder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:22:59 -0400
Ruben, you say that you prefer the older screen for judging depth-of-field. But with a TLR, the
aperture of the viewing lens is fixed (no iris) so you can only view the D-o-F at what amounts to a
wide-open taking lens, regardless of the actual aperture chosen for exposure, e.g., f/8.
Or am I missing something?
Stan Yoder
Pittsburgh
P.S. For my 2.8F, I invested in a screen from Ian Parker's Rollei Club (Isle of Jersey) which
supposedly is from the 6000-series SLRs. Got it via Jimmy Koh about ten years ago. It's bright and
works well. Marvin Wallace's screen in my 3.5E is pretty good, too.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
