Filter quality and its effect on the image is one of the great black boxes of photography. At least one, and I believe several, of the photo mags tested filter quality and if memory serves me right found it all over the place with no correlation between price and quality and little consistency from year to year across brands. Clearly H&H will be of the opinion that such markings on the filter glass will not obviously harm image quality or they would not do it. Whether or not this is accurate information across all shooting situations is still very much an open question in my mind, and I agree with Richard Knoppow's view posted earlier... Eric Goldstein -- On 5/16/07, Robert Lilley <54moggie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim et al, I talked to Harrison & Harrison and one of the Harrisons told me that the nomenclature on the filter glass itself will not affect pictures as long as it is in front of the nodal point of the lens. Of course he told me to take some pictures and get back to him if there are problems. He added that this is how Harrison and Harrison gets away with dot screens on filters - which they are famous for. "Been doing it this way for 78 years" Rob --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list