[rollei_list] Re: Happy new Year and best wishes for 2015!
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 09:14:22 -0300
Emmanuel:
Best wishes to you too. Incredible,you even did not use a
tripod... Beautiful panorama, well done!. The camera elevated position and
the subject-camera distance helped the software to stitch the frames
without significant distortion. You chose an ideal subject for a stitched
pano.
I have the 2.8C loaded with TMax 400 B&W film and the 3.5F with Portra 400
color negative film, I'll use one of them for a pano I have thought for
some time. I hope the weather helps tomorrow for a short fluvial trip.
Carlos
2015-01-03 8:06 GMT-03:00 Emmanuel BIGLER <bigler@xxxxxxxx>:
> Hello from France!
>
> Happy new Year and best wishes for 2015!
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/43175600@N00/16181483322/
> (taken with a Rollei 3.5F TLR on Kodak Portra 400; low resolution 600 dpi
> scans on a Fuji Frontier machine)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> I also wanted to share my first attempt for a panoramic shot stitched from
> 3 square frames taken with the same 3.5F camera.
> Doing so, I'm just re-doing what was described in Rollei litterature
> before WW-II, so this is not really fresh news ;-)
> However I just tried the Hugin http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
> + Panorama-tools http://panotools.sourceforge.net/
> under linux for the first time and it went like a charm in a few clicks
> without reading the software manual ;-)
> (as everybody knows, reading an instructions manual is the very last thing
> to do after everything else fails). Again, this is not fresh news since
> amateur photographers have been doing digital image stitching intensively
> since, at least, the beginning of this century ...
>
> The 3 original images, carelessly taken hand-held and, of course without
> any consideration for the entrance pupil of the 3.5-75 planar:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/43175600@N00/15248471183/in/
> set-72157594535892688
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/43175600@N00/16181342822/in/
> set-72157594535892688
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/43175600@N00/16156294846/in/
> set-72157594535892688
>
> And this is what Hugin + Panorama tools computed for me in a few seconds
> after automatic alignment - automatic stitching and selecting "cylindrical
> projection"
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/43175600@N00/15986052470/in/
> set-72157594535892688
>
> The only data I had to enter manually is the horizontal field of view for
> each frame. I entered 35° which is actually close to the theoretical
> horizontal field of view for a 56 mm image shot with a 80 mm (35°);
> actually I should have entered 36.7° for 75mm (3.5F), apparently the
> software does not care for such a small error.
>
> All the best!
> --
> Emmanuel
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in the
> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in
> the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
Other related posts:
