[rodgersorgan] Fw: PDI vs. Trillium
- From: "Noel Heinze" <noel.heinze@xxxxxxx>
- To: "RodgersUsers" <rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:13:06 -0400
AM REPOSTING THIS IN CASE ORIGINAL GOT LOST...
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Heinze <noel.heinze@xxxxxxx>
To: rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [rodgersorgan] PDI vs. Trillium
>This is also directed to John Jarvis re 835 vs XYZ...I have an 835, love it
>madly, it does not have RSS but my church has good acoustics and I don't
>think RSS would make much difference in my situation...even in a smaller
>dead room I'd say the 835 is a better buy...spend time with each model
>you're considering...if you think RSS is a better deal than more stops, are
>you really really really sure? Is the sound quality of the Trillium that
>much better that you would make do with fewer stops? These are
>trade-offs...don't buy a car just because you like the color. I'd go with
>the 835 because it's got good sound, good price, good stoplist, and the
>pre-RSS "reverb" system is OK, too. What about the speaker systems for the
>models you're considering...this enters the mix, too. Bottom line: if you
>seem drawn to one, if you think you'll always regret not getting it, if you
>like A but B is where your heart is, then that's the one for you.
>
>Noel Heinze
>
>
Other related posts:
- » [rodgersorgan] Fw: PDI vs. Trillium
