>>RetroWeb 1.2 has been set up on the retroforth.org server. It appears >>to work properly (I haven't done a lot of testing yet...) >> >> > >1.x releases should now maintain backwards compatibility. >All ( html documents will still work, with (xhtml you might >be able to satisfy the w3c xhtml validator, too. > > That's good. Now I can start rewriting the retroforth.org site using it :-) >>Stefan, have you tried the RetroForth 7.5 core with this yet? Also, I'm >> >> > >not yet, but it's on my todo list. > > Once you try it, let me know if there are any problems with it. Hopefully it'll work with a "stock" version of 7.5 >>hoping to make a few minor additions to RetroWeb that could yield a big >>performance boost under Linux in the near future :-) >> >> > >I'm looking forward to this, and now is the perfect time, as >1.2 should stay current for quite a while. If we have a >high performance RetroWeb, shall we call it TetraWeb? :-) > > No! It's just a quick couple of quick hacks to the core (all implemented in Forth of course), so no reason to rename it :-) -- Charles