[real-eyes] Re: Interesting Debate About Screen Readers Using MirrorDrivers
- From: "Jim Fettgather" <jimkc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:57:56 -0500
Freedombox and System Access fully support Vista very well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "& Ruthie" <chaosynchronous@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:31 PM
Subject: [real-eyes] Re: Interesting Debate About Screen Readers Using
MirrorDrivers
Here's a question...does freedombox work with Vista?
Ruthie &
Every Titanic has its iceberg.
MSN Messenger ID: ruthie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AOL and Yahoo Messenger ID: chaosynchronous
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fettgather" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:27 PM
Subject: [real-eyes] Interesting Debate About Screen Readers Using
MirrorDrivers
>
>
> Two fairly technical articles are now available debating the use of mirror
> drivers by screen readers that work with Windows Vista. The first article
> opposing the use of mirror drivers is written by Matt Campbell and Mike
> Calvo from Serotek who develop System Access and the Freedom Box products.
> This article can be found at
> www.freedombox.info/mirror-driver-paper_000.html.
> The second article in favour of the use of mirror drivers is written by
> Doug
> Geoffray from GW Micro and can be found at
> http://gwmicro.com/blog/index.php/all/2007/03/14/p28#more28
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options,
> go to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go
to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go to
www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
Other related posts:
