[ratpack] Re: I can't believe the difference in these images
- From: "Jim Dos" <jdos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ratpack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:34:26 -0500
what do they say ? better late than never ? glad it's working better for ya
J
----- Original Message -----
From: Ray Buck
To: ratpack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 12:11 AM
Subject: [ratpack] I can't believe the difference in these images
I've been less than effervescent about my 7D ever since I got it. It seemed
to be lacking something, although I could get fairly good stuff from it. But
after setting the Sharpness, Contrast and Saturation in the User-defined
Picture style, I gotta say that I'm absolutely flabbergasted. Check these two
images. Number 0027 is the standard setting in the camera. Number 0348 is
with the above adjustments maxed out. I applied the same post-processing
procedures to both of 'em.
The first is what I've been seeing from the camera and wondered why I was
always adding color saturation to the shots. The second is probably a bit over
the top and certainly isn't what one would want to use for portraiture, but fer
cryin out loud, why did Canon decide to cripple this frikkin camera out of the
box? These settings are on just about any EOS DSLR (I think they're on the
Rebel models, although I'm not positive) but they didn't seem to make such a
difference in image quality. This is also unreel. I'm coming unglued.
I dunno what to say. I'm just gonna go back to work on the posters I have to
have prepped for the ayem. Btw, there will be "Pirate Chicks" at the false
grid for the "Pirate Invitational" race, probably on the pre-grid at 9 am.
r
--
Sent from my Dreadnought using that barely tolerable Thunderbird email program
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1791 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
The Professional version does not have this message
Other related posts:
