[racktables-users] Re: site network vlan mapping
- From: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Oscar Kene <oscar@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:30:47 +0100
At present, no. Multiple instances of Racktables is the present
recommendation (and a poor one).
Regards,
Tyler
On 2012-08-20 14:46, Oscar Kene wrote:
> Yes, exactly. I know this is not optimal but it is used like this where I
> am. Any suggestions on how to solve this?
>
> /Oscar
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Tyler J. Wagner <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> VLAN support is based by domain, which can be any text string you want,
> including a site name. IPv4 addresses are global, however. Do you mean you
> use the same RFC 1918 private IP space at each site?
>
> Regards,
> Tyler
>
> On 2012-08-20 13:55, Oscar Kene wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm in a situation where I need to implement some kind of datacenter
> > documentation system. So far Racktables looks like it fits the part. One
> > thing stops me from moving forward right now though.
> >
> > In my environment I have many sites and offices. All the offices use the
> > same VLAN structure and addresses despite being both layer2 and layer3
> > separated, so VLan X and address Y exists on several offices locally. So
> > some kind of SITE:NETWORK:VLAN mapping is needed. As far as I can see
> this
> > is not possible in Racktables? I've seen an old thread from 2010 that
> > discusses this but the outcome of that was kind of nothing.
> >
> > Have Racktables support for the above or plan to have it?
>
> --
> "Perl is like vise grips. You can do anything with it but it is the
> wrong tool for every job."
> -- Bruce Eckel
>
>
--
"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any
other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its
worst."
-- Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers, 1959
Other related posts:
