That is somewhat good for everything exept when you should see where the cabels are connected. Then you cant see witch of the two that cable is connected to. Alain Iltchev said to do the same way, but with IPS, FQDN on master, and ports on the slaves. I thing i will do it this way first.. The only thing is that it looks a little more messy i think.. I'll try a couple of things and then i deside. Mvh/Best regards Tormod Hope IT Consulting Engineer Eidesvik AS Phone : +47 53 44 80 83 Switchboard : +47 53 44 80 00 Mobile : +47 930 60 727 E-mail : tormod.hope@xxxxxxxxxxx Homepage : www.eidesvik.no As a part of our blue:Epolicy: Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail notice Confidentiality and Disclaimer notice The information contained in this e-mail is intended solely for the use of the addressee and it is sent in the strictest confidence, and may contain legally privileged information. If you have received this e-mail in error you must preserve its confidentiality, and immediately advise the sender. Should you have received this communication in error, please note that making use of the information, forwarding it, copying it, or in any way disclosing its content to any other person, is strictly prohibited. It is the sole responsibility of the addressee to scan this e-mail and any attachments for computer viruses or other defects. The sender does not accept liability for any loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may result directly or indirectly from this e-mail or any file attached. This e-mail may not necessarily reflect the views or intentions of Eidesvik Offshore ASA or its subsidiaries, who therefore does not accept any liability whatsoever for any claims, loss or damages of whatsoever nature, arising directly or indirectly, as a result of the reliance on such information by anyone. Unless the intention to contract has been expressly manifested in this message by a duly authorized representative of the company, this message shall not be construed as a solicitation to contract nor an offer or acceptance of any contractual obligations. From: Alexey Andrianov <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Date: 16.07.2014 14:18 Subject: [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Stacked Switch - Cisco Sent by: racktables-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx We manage stacks this way: One object is 'master', it has all the ports, IPs, FQDN and so on. Other objects, 'slaves', have no IPs and ports. They have different names (the name of the stack with numeric suffix), tagged with the 'slave' tag, mounted in a rack, and, optionally, are nested into a master switch using the containers feature. By the way, you can mount an object into multiple racks, so may be you don't need separate objects at all. 16.07.2014 15:48, tormod.hope@xxxxxxxxxxx пишет: We have two Cisco 4500X switches, stacked with VSS and mounted in different serverrooms. How do i fix that? I see two problems. 1. If i just split them, and create 2 switches, everything will be good in the racks, but how to add IP adresses? 2. If i create one switch, with all the interfaces, then i can add IP adresses, but i cant mount them in 2 different racks.. Switch stacks are difficult in racktables. -- Best regards, Alexey