[racktables-users] Re: Virtual Stacked Switch - Cisco
- From: Alain Iltchev <alain.iltchev@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:12:24 +0200
Hi,
I usually create an object for each physical switch
belonging to a stack and a dedicated object with a new custom type Network
Switch Stack that can contain Network Switches. The physical ports are
created on the switches and the IP addressing on the stack.
Regarding the Rack placement, I put the stack in the front row of each rack
unit occupied by the stack and every switch in the interior row of the same
rack unit. The same modelling applies for our firewall clusters.
Best regards,
Alain Iltchev
2014-07-16 13:59 GMT+02:00 Lucas Aimaretto <laimaretto@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:48 AM, <tormod.hope@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> We have two Cisco 4500X switches, stacked with VSS and mounted in
>> different serverrooms.
>> How do i fix that?
>>
>> I see two problems.
>> 1. If i just split them, and create 2 switches, everything will be good
>> in the racks, but how to add IP adresses?
>> 2. If i create one switch, with all the interfaces, then i can add IP
>> adresses, but i cant mount them in 2 different racks..
>>
>> Switch stacks are difficult in racktables.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> How about using shared-type addresses?
>
> br!
>
> lucas
>
> --
> "Antes teníamos hambre y mirábamos el reloj para saber qué hora era. Ahora
> miramos el reloj para saber si tenemos hambre." -- Ernesto Sábato
>
Other related posts:
