[racktables-users] Re: RackTables RPM
- From: Luis Fernando Lacayo <lflacayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:43:40 -0500
Hummm!!! I was just trying to help out. But you are right that script
is no longer there. That was a script that allowed you to supply the
password for the admin user. I have not done a fresh install since I
have started using RackTables so I did not notice that the script was
missing.
Good luck, and thanks for your work on creating the RPM.
Luis
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 21:35 +0800, Colin Coe wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't clear.
>
> This is a fresh virtual machine with no previous install of RackTables
> and MySQL is empty.
>
> Also, the install procedure on the wiki seems a little out of date.
> For example, in the section 'Import SQL Files Into Your Database', it
> mentions 'install/init-auth.sql' which doesn't exist.
>
> Thanks
>
> CC
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Luis Fernando
> Lacayo<lflacayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > that error is do to the fact that the Database that was used in your RPM was
> > not the latest... Did you use a database that was created already or does
> > your RPM create a new RPM?
> >
> > I came to a similar issue yesterday wehn I was try to upgrade a 16.3 to
> > 17.4. The DB structure changed and you have to upgrade to 16.4 then to 17+
> >
> > Luis
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 20:48 +0800, Colin Coe wrote:
> >
> > Quick question.
> > I was testing my RPM for RackTables on a fresh machine and everything
> > seemed OK until I browsed to the URL and got this message:
> > ---
> > This Racktables installation seems to be just upgraded to version
> > 0.17.4, while the database version is 0.14.4. No user will be either
> > authenticated or shown any page until the upgrade is finished. Follow
> > this link and authenticate as administrator to finish the upgrade.
> > ---
> > At this point MySQL server has just been installed and a root password
> > set but nothing else.
> > Any ideas why it thinks it has a 0.14.4 version DB?
> > Thanks
> > CC
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Les Mikesell<lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Colin Coe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Does CentOS still exist? Has the owner/maintainer/theGuyInCharge(tm) run
> >>> away?
> >>
> >> Yes, the only real problem was the ownership/control of the domain name
> >> and
> >> that is resolved now.
> >>
> >>> Not familar with CentOS, only that its based on RHEL.
> >>
> >> It is a rebuild-from-source project with a goal of binary compatibility
> >> with
> >> the upstream distribution (whose name they can't mention due to trademark
> >> restrictions...). But, the place for 3rd party packages would be either
> >> the EPEL or rpmforge repositories, depending on whose guidelines you want
> >> to
> >> follow. These are usable by RHEL, Centos, Scientific Linux, etc. EPEL
> >> tends to be a little more careful not to overwrite anything included in
> >> the
> >> stock distribution.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Les Mikesell
> >> lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Luis Fernando Lacayo
> > Chicago Public Schools
> > Senior Unix Administrator
> > ITS/ UNIX Infrastructure
> > Office: 773-553-3835
> > Cell: 773-203-4493
> > lflacayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ______________________________________________________
> > "In God we trust, the rest we monitor ..."
> >
>
>
>
--
______________________________________________________
Luis Fernando Lacayo
Chicago Public Schools
Senior Unix Administrator
ITS/ UNIX Infrastructure
Office: 773-553-3835
Cell: 773-203-4493
lflacayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________
"In God we trust, the rest we monitor ..."
Other related posts:
