I would mount as back only when selecting checkboxes.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Leggett, Torrance I. <tleggett@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Because there are vertical mounted switches in between the two halves and
on the right hand side that I'm not real sure how to organize in the
current rack layouts.
From: <racktables-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Chris James <
chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 11:44 AM
To: "racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [racktables-users] Re: Creating new racks with different
dimensions
Why bother a whole new design for what is essentially 2 extremely short
depth racks? Why not add 2 side by side, A1/A2 etc.
-Chris
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Leggett, Torrance I. <tleggett@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Is there a way to create a new rack type with different physical
dimensions as well as how objects can be added? We have many racks of IBM
iDataPlex racks that aren't laid out in typical rack fashion (
https://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/idataplx/documentation/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.idataplex.doc/dg9idp_r_rack.html
)
This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged
information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).
Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the
taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited.
E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they
can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates
with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. This company is
not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any
responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion
and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
