Corporate tortfeasors must be crying in their beer (single-malt Scotch more likely) over the failure of Bush's class action reforms to pass the Senate. Now they'll have to wait a year, and grease a few more senators, before they try to ram this through again. I see business groups are arguing that companies are being sued out of business. I'd like to see one that didn't deserve it. It's good to see the little guy win one for a change. Senate blocks limits on class action suits By Deborah McGregor in Washington Financial Times www.ft.com Published: October 22 2003 20:16 | Last Updated: October 22 2003 20:16 The US Senate on Wednesday blocked business-backed legislation aimed at curbing class action lawsuits, dealing a blow to President George W. Bush's longstanding drive for sweeping legal reforms. In a 59-39 vote, Republicans, who control the Senate, fell one vote short of prevailing in a procedural showdown with Democrats that underscored the difficulties of moving Mr Bush's policy agenda through the narrowly divided chamber. The issue is now considered dead for the year. Republicans, from Mr Bush down, had argued that shifting many class action cases from state to federal courts, as the legislation provided, would discourage frivolous lawsuits. But Democrats said the Republican leadership had excluded them from crafting a compromise that would have been acceptable. And they said the bill was meant mainly to hurt trial lawyers who litigate the cases. Heading into an election year, both parties are keenly attuned to their campaign contributors. Trial lawyers give most of their contributions to Democrats, while business tends to support the Republicans. Class action lawsuits allow plaintiffs whose injuries might not be worth enough to justify bringing individual suits to combine their claims into one lawsuit against a common defendant. Business had pushed hard for the legislation, saying many companies are being sued out of existence. They were encouraged when Republicans swept Congress in last year's elections. Mr Bush has made countless speeches touting the need to tackle the nation's litigation crisis. But the highly charged issue failed to swing enough Democrats, who argued that the legislation would penalize the victims of corporate wrongdoing. "Defendant corporations don't want to be held liable for their misconduct and if held responsible they want to pay less money," said Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat. Meanwhile, prospects have grown increasingly dim for legislation tackling other legal reforms. Negotiations in Congress aimed at finalizing asbestos litigation have so far failed to produce a compromise. Medical malpractice legislation is likewise stalled. With Congress scheduled to adjourn for the year on November 7, there appears little prospect for further action. Although Republicans can try again next year, it is notoriously difficult to enact such controversial measures in a presidential election year and most business lobbyists now consider the chances extremely slim.