No problem on using my comments - they are just as likely to offend as help :) The thing that both I don't understand and that bugs me about people and recumbents is the following . . . Everyone can go into some sort of "bulk" store and grab an inexpensive bike off the rack, pay a minimal amount of money, and away they go happy as a lark. Most are completely oblivious to frame size, crank length, seat height, handle bar height and extension, any kind of comfortable ergonomic set-up, etc. If you ask them how it "feels" or "fits", they sort of look up in the air and shrug their shoulders and say "I guess it's ok . . ." I have also lost track of people I see on DFs that have a seat pointed up like it's ready to launch into space, handle bars that aren't even close to being lined up with the front wheel, front and rear wheels that don't track in line with each other, loose or bent pedals that wobble and twist completely out of plane with each other, derailleurs that are so un-adjusted that they only get a couple gears (if more than one), one brake on one wheel with pads that are completely fried, or my personal favorite, the people who ride with one crank so loose, that it can rotate nearly 1/4 turn without ever moving the BB axle. The point of the little rant, is that people simply adapt to whatever it is they're riding unless they're the kind of person who is willing to pay the cash for a "boutique" bike along with the fees to test the ergonomics and set it up perfectly for themselves. Even numbers of these, though, can have the same observations from above applied to them. What I don't get is how when it comes to recumbents, all of a sudden people are afficionados that need to immediately micro-manage the smallest details of a recumbent's configuration, on something they've quite likely never even ridden, yet they are nearly oblivious to the same concerns on the bike they're riding now? Every bike and bent out there is a collection of compromises. They are all designed for a specific purpose, like any other type of transportation, and if you start getting to the edge or outside their design limits, they start behaving badly. If they are a Jack-of-all-trades, then they might be mediocre at many things, and that in itself might become a problem. I really enjoy riding any kind of new bent and seeing what its personality and quirks are. I know what I like and what I find comfortable, but that doesn't mean that some other type is lacking merit because it sits outside my preferences. Every time I see someone ride a bent and come back with a long list of "suggestions", if I'm in the mood, I explain why their suggestions will or won't work (if I know), and if I don't feel like it, I just tell them "It is what it is. You can't carry 20 sheets of plywood on top of your car because it wasn't built for it. If this bent isn't doing something, it's simply because it wasn't built for it." This isn't any kind of a slam on you Doug, or on anyone in the list. This is just an observation on what I've learning since being "bent". In the end, like I said, if someone really doesn't want to have pedal steer, they'll likely succeed if they put the effort into it. :) > 25hz, I take a lot of encouragement in what you say, > because although I've been working on the bikes for > about a year, I haven't had the opportunity for much > seat time, and the bike does respond well to circular > pedalling and forced relaxation (is that an oxymoron?) > of the shoulders. Come to think of it, I also > experience some pedal steer on my Vision R40 SWB. And > as you observe, it gets more pronounced as my legs > become tired. > > I guess one of my background concerns is that on a > moving bottom bracket FWD, pedal steer can work the > upper body and shoulders, and things that are a minor > annoyance on short rides can become endurance issues > on long rides (I intend to ride this bike on a 150 > mile, two-day charity ride in early June.) So if there > is a mechanical route to lessen the effect, I'm > interested. > > Perhaps practice and discipline are the first order of > the day however... > > Dirk, thanks for describing in detail the effect of > increasing the trail dimension on your Camel Bike. You > have saved me another path of experimentation, as I > was about to increase the trail dimension as a test. > > 25hz, I would like to post your observations about > riding style on the Cruzbike Yahoo group. Is this > acceptable to you? > > Again, thanks for your observations. > > Doug ============================================================ This is the Python Mailinglist //www.freelists.org/list/python Listmaster: Jürgen Mages jmages@xxxxxx To unsubscribe send an empty mail to python-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field. ============================================================