Richard, I suspect incomplete mixing to begin with rather than a separation later. When mixing HC110 I almost always make a standard stock solution. However, when mixing Ilford Ilfotec HC I make small 1 liter batches. I use warm to hot water to rinse my graduate out after measuring. I can see that some may not get good consistency from liquid developer, if a short shake or cool water is used. I not saying one should sake so vigorously to create bubbles, but new batches should be stirred well.
Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean that the factory mixes incompletely?
--shannon
Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214-827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com-----Original Message----- From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver- bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Knoppow Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:23 AM To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [pure-silver] Re: [inconsistent shaking of developer
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shannon Stoney" <sstoney@xxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:58 PM Subject: [pure-silver] [inconsistent shaking of developer
> Eric wrote: > >>Shannon, Did you first and foremost make sure that your >>developer was well >>mixed? Just because you start with a liquid developer >>doesn't mean that you >>don't need to mix it up. I had a bad experience with >>someone that used one >>of my darkrooms years ago. He made some HC110 to process >>some film and >>complained that his film was thin, but he marked it up to >>under exposure. We >>went to process some of our enlarged negative materials >>and every thing was >>extremely weak. I soon noticed that the color in the >>bottle was not >>uniformed and the difference was not shadowing but rather >>that it was not >>fully mixed. Shook the bottle and WOW! Back to expected >>results. We even >>trimmed the dilution a little to compensate for poor >>mixing. > > > I did two more batches this afternoon, carefully shaking > the DDX bottle before diluting, and it seemed to help. > Most of the negatives are correct now, and the ones that > aren't were probably bad due to human error (mine). > > I exposed some older film this afternoon and processed it, > and it seemed to do fine, as well as the newer film, so it > probably wasn't the film age. > > I will write a big sign on my developer : SHAKE!!! So I > won't forget in the future. > > Thanks, > > --shannon > I am very puzzled by what could be in this developer that separates. AFAIK, the ingredients go into solution. Once in solution just gravity should not separate them. Developers are not like milk, which is not a solution but an emulsion. If subject to low temperatures its possible that something crystalizes but should go right back into solution once warmed up again.
--- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================== ============================================== To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.