> I've been thinking about Dan's idea of the "end of the silver era" > hypothesis about inconsistent results with TXP. I just looked at the > two boxes of TXP that I have. One was bought at a local camera store > and has an expiration date of 2/2008. I used this film a couple of > weeks ago in New Orleans and it performed perfectly. The other came > from BH PHotovideo and has an expiration date of 3/2006. It seems > that this box from BH is two years older than the other box! I have > not used this film yet. > > That got me wondering: how is film dated? How long is it expected > to last? That is, when a sheet of TXP is absolutely fresh, right out > of the factory, how much into the future is it dated? And why would > the camera store have much fresher film than BH? > > --shannon Kodak has done some sub rosa shuffling with the various iterations of Tri-X within the last couple of years. The older emulsion was rated at 320 but the newer rollfilms at least, I don't know about sheets, is rated at 400. The older version of TXP was somewhat slower than the newest but not enough to cause that much difference. I too would tend toward accidental underexposure. What developer did you use? Did you use a filter when taking? JB ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.