I would say so ... The common sunny 16 rule being f/16 1/100 100ISO, then you exposed 200 times more, that should make a 0.5 ISO for your paper. Claudio Bonavolta http://www.bonavolta.ch ----- Message d'origine ----- De: mmagid3005@xxxxxxx Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:17:34 -0400 Sujet: [pure-silver] Test of Efke Direct Positive Paper À: idcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >I purchased a package of the Efke Direct Positive B & W Positive Paper from >Freestyle a couple of months ago. Freestyle claimed the ISO was approximately >1 to 6. To test the ISO I loaded the paper into film holders ands exposed >them in a Miniature Speed Graphic, which has a pretty accurate Supermatic >shutter. The day measured to be a perfect Sunny 16 on my Gossen Luna Pro >meter. I made a series of exposures at f/16 starting at 1/2 second, then >doubling the time for each successive photo. I developed the prints in Ilford >developer, 1:14, for 1.5 minutes. I scanned them on my Epson 1680 at 96 dpi, >with no manipulation. The results are shown at this Flickr site : > > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/29332295@N03/?saved=1 > > > > >It appears the 2 second exposure is the best, though a finer test from 1.5 to >2.5 sec. would be useful. But assuming the 2 second exposure is right-on, >then the reciprocal of 2 should be the ISO, or 1/2, for an ISO of 0.5. Am I >correct in this? The next project with this paper is to use it in my Gordon >Street Camera, sometime this fall. > > > > >The other photo on the site is me in my darkroom with my Folmer & Schwing 4 X >5 aerial camera, circa WWI. > > > > >Marty > ============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.