we hadn't talked temp yet, but you may also see changes in tones based on temperature of solutions. So it is best to stay somewhat consistent including through the wash step. I am not talking just the toning solution but also the temp of your developing line. Anything that changes the speed of the process can be a factor. I also like my selenium toner on the strong side but find that 1:9 gives me more control for slight changes. It would of course depend on , to completion, and I think that was the OPs goal. Eric Neilsen Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 www.ericneilsenphotography.com skype me with ejprinter www.ericneilsenphotography.com/forum1 Let's Talk Photography -----Original Message----- From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lloyd Erlick Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:13 AM To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Selenium toning inconsistency At 02:31 PM 7/26/2010 , you wrote: ... >Does anyone out there have a good handle on what makes changes in the >final color? >Developer changes? Dilution, composition? >Selenium differences? Age, dilution, exhaustion? >Paper differences? same paper but different batch? > >thanks for anything you might know about it. >Dennis Purdy >============== July 27, 2010, from Lloyd Erlick, Your list of possibles is pretty likely. Age of the selenium toner might not be such a huge factor; mine is years old, and has occasionally stood idle for many months. Exhaustion of the toner is a big deal; there is little point in storing highly dilute selenium toner. I like mine fairly concentrated, though, and that is expensive. I dilute selenium toner 1+5 in distilled water, and I find that long before I suspect toner exhaustion, solution carry-out on may sheets of paper has reduced the quantity to the point I have to top up with fresh toner diluted 1+5. So exhaustion never really enters into it. Developer differences are crucial. For fine work I always start with a fresh batch. Hopefully it will be the same as the previous time I mixed it, eh? But batch to batch differences in paper manufacture? I found MGW to be a very reliable product. But definitely from time to time I noticed small differences. Once I had a box of 11x14 sheets of MGW at the same time as I had a box of larger sheets, I think 20x24. Both supposedly the same specs, but the surface was different one t'other. One's surface gloss was glossier than from the other box. I'm pretty sure I've noticed different reactions to developer and toner over the millennia, but I've never made the side by side comparison you've been doing, so I have nothing to point to. Frankly, I'd suspect manufacturer batch discrepancies first for the problem you're describing, but Ilford could easily respond that my difficulties were mainly long ago when the product was only a babe. Fixer mixed with distilled water; fixer based on sodium thiosulfate; fixer with no hardener. I think these things help, but I can't quote numbers and graphs. regards, --le ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. website: www.heylloyd.com telephone: 416-686-0326 email: portrait@xxxxxxxxxxxx ________________________________ -- ============================================================================ ================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.15530) http://www.pctools.com/ ======= ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.